At 02:25 PM 6/22/01 -0400, Geoff Talvola wrote:
>At 01:18 PM 6/22/01 -0500, Ian Bicking wrote:
>>Did you see the patch I submitted on sourceforge for this? It
>>included a modified version of cgitb with several small (but I think
>>important) enhancements.
>
>No, I didn't know about the patch. I'll take a look right now.
I downloaded the patch. I couldn't get your modified version of cgitb.py
to work. It worked running it from the command line as a self-test, but it
failed when I tried to use it within Webware.
Generally, I think we're better off not including modified versions of
3rd-party modules in Webware, especially when the unmodified version works
adequately. Instead, I'd recommend trying to get the author of cgitb to
incorporate your improvements.
I also prefer the approach I took of adding the "fancy traceback" to the
end of the error page instead of replacing the standard traceback. This is
because the amount of information in the fancy traceback can be
overwhelming, and most of the time I'd rather just see the standard traceback.
Any other opinions?
--
- Geoff Talvola
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
Webware-discuss mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webware-discuss
