At 01:13 PM 11/2/2001 -0800, Mike Orr wrote: >How about WWMiscUtils & WWWebUtils, or ChuckMiscUtils & ChuckWebUtils, >or ceMiscUtils & ceWebUtils (using Chuck's initials)? Those names are >much less generic, thus making others feel better about giving Chuck >"ownership" of those prefixes.
There's no way we're injecting my name into software components. I _like_ having a team of developers, patch contributors, users, etc. and not all software in those packages comes from me. I also strive to make Webware manageable without me, for example, documenting my release procedures and the style guidelines. I would also consider future packages like DBUtils if there is enough material to warrant them. I still don't think *Utils is out there, especially with a cap U. I chose it, in part, because I really hadn't seen it, which is also why I avoided *lib, not to mention those are usually modules, not packages. -Chuck _______________________________________________ Webware-discuss mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webware-discuss
