On Mon, Nov 05, 2001 at 01:47:14PM -0800, Chuck Esterbrook wrote: > * Right now, Webware has only HTML docs, written in HTML. > * Even if we chose LaTeX or DocBook, we would still just produce... HTML.
And ps, my favorite format for printing!!!!! (No need for a ps vs pdf debate, Chuck. :) Although I suppose there's an html2ps coverter somewhere. (Yes, Netscape does it, but it's a pain when you want to print a bunch of documents or a hierarchy of documents at once.) > If I do roll my own, I don't see why I would have to switch to something > else anytime later. The reason to switch is when you run up against the limitations of the structured-text format or of the tools available (or conveniently writable) for it. If that never happens, there's no need to switch. > I might spec this out. Otherwise, I'll keep thinking about it. Spec'ing > things usually lets me put them on a mental backburner. And the wiki is a great place to put specs, because somebody else might read them and contribute to them, or even do your project for you. -- -Mike (Iron) Orr, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (if mail problems: [EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://iron.cx/ English * Esperanto * Russkiy * Deutsch * Espan~ol _______________________________________________ Webware-discuss mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webware-discuss
