On Thursday 29 November 2001 02:09 pm, Ian Bicking wrote: > There's still something about Netscape 4.x, despite all it's lameness, > that keeps me coming back from time to time. �It's just so much more > responsive than all the modern browsers, even IE (though Opera could > probably win me over if I gave it a chance).
I haven't tried their last major release, since it's still alpha. I tried their previous stable release on Linux and it does a very poor job at rendering. On Thursday 29 November 2001 05:03 pm, Ian Bicking wrote: > No, but this was just when I hit the reload button (on a page from > POST), so the cache shouldn't be involved... but then, maybe it is even > though it shouldn't be. I agree. Reload should mean reload. And with all those no-cache headers I put in, it should _really_ mean reload. But read on... On Thursday 29 November 2001 06:25 pm, Tavis Rudd wrote: > Netscape on Windows used to have an option to explicitly ignore > cached versions of a page when reloading. �You had to hold the shift > key down while clicking the reload button. �That probably went away a > long time ago ... worth a shot. Tavis, you are the man! This works in Mozilla 0.9.x. It's not a perfect world, but if I can hit Shift+click to really reload a page (instead of just pretending to!), then I can carry on with Linux. I almost contemplated a return to Windows. I reload all the time as I refine my web apps. I never realized how much until now. -Chuck _______________________________________________ Webware-discuss mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webware-discuss
