On Wed, Feb 27, 2002 at 02:14:56PM -0800, Tavis Rudd wrote:
> Why not just use some form of webware-based authentication?  You'll 
> get better control, support, and possibly security (assuming https).

It's a question of using the simplest technology necessary to do the
job, preferring something that's long established and very widely
tested if it's adequate.  And of course, "adequate" depends on the
particular application.  Some applications may require the features
a Python authentication module can provide; for others it's overkill,
and all the little quirks that come up just mean more things to debug.

And of course, some sites may prefer to standardize on one
authentication module for everything because it's required for one
of their applications.  But they should have the choice of using
different existing modules according to the type of application, if
they wish.

-- 
-Mike (Iron) Orr, [EMAIL PROTECTED]  (if mail problems: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
   http://iron.cx/     English * Esperanto * Russkiy * Deutsch * Espan~ol

_______________________________________________
Webware-discuss mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webware-discuss

Reply via email to