On Sun, 2002-03-31 at 05:56, Chuck Esterbrook wrote: > I'm not saying that your caching framework ideas don't offer some > bonuses over "caching in object attributes", just that the PROBLEM > statement is too strong. > > In any case, good luck. It will be interesting to see if you and Terrel > collaborate on this. If you haven't read this yet, you should: > > http://jaguar.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/wiki/DependencyManagementService >
Thanks for the plug, Chuck. Tavis, I created the page mentioned by Chuck when we first started discussing the caching strategy in Cheetah about a year ago. It has been sitting fairly dormant since then, until about a month ago when I started kicking it around a bit. Anyone interested in discussing this can hang out on http://jaguar.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/wiki/ and/or join the jaguar-devel mailing list. > > I'm certainly open to tweaking and refactoring WebKit to support a good > CacheKit. > Cool. I think my original plan would be a fairly invasive refactoring, but a solid regression test suite and a lot of benchmarks should make it palatable. Now for some code to back it up .... 8-) -- Terrel p.s. sorry about the slow response. Sponsored by http://www.ThinkGeek.com/ _______________________________________________ Webware-discuss mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webware-discuss
