On Wed, 2002-04-17 at 12:43, Kendall Clark wrote: > On Wed, Apr 17, 2002 at 10:20:21AM -0700, Chuck Esterbrook wrote: > > On Wednesday 17 April 2002 09:05 am, Mike Orr wrote: > > > Have you looked into webware.cx as a domain name? It's available. > > > Cost is just under $40 for the first year, and the same for each > > > 2-year period thereafter. $10 of that is donated to Christmas > > > Island's national Internet infrastructure. You can order immediately > > > online and change your nameserver settings on the web. I've used > > > them for over two years and haven't had any problem. The only > > > (dis)advantage is that they don't spam you, not even to warn you that > > > your registration is expiring. Your host just becomes "not found" > > > suddenly until you renew it. > > > > > > http://netdns.cx/ > > > > > > I'm not sure if "webware.cx" is any better or worse than > > "webware.sf.net". > > webware.info isn't too bad, IMO. Better than .cx.
Only .tv and .bz are available (though .cx isn't listed on that)... webware.tv doesn't seem quite right somehow... webwarepy.* are available, as are webware-py.*, pywebware.*, and py-webware.* -- none of these are that much better than webware.sf.net, *but* it's entirely possible that something could happen to SourceForge... probably something would take it's place and domain names, but you never know... it would be nice to have an independent existence. Webwareforpython.* and webware4python.* are not taken, of course. Those just role off your tongue, no? Actually, do they role off the keyboard well? Another consideration is that Webware is a very, very generic name. Without losing "Webware", it might make sense to start qualifying the name more fully. So if WebwareForPython.org is long to spell, at least when you refer to it you aren't being at all ambiguous. It doesn't matter on this list, since it's contextualized, but outside of the list it could be a useful to better clarify the identity. I'm not sold on "for Python" as a good qualifier. It's not like there's a Webware for Java. I assume Chuck would be much more open to new adaptations to that portion of the name. Nothing is coming to mind, though. Ian _______________________________________________ Webware-discuss mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webware-discuss
