On Thu, 2002-06-06 at 20:38, A. Keyton Weissinger wrote: > As for using WebUnit. I certainly do NOT have anything against it. It makes > a lot of sense. I didn't use it the first time around because I didn't > investigate it as much as I should have before too much water passed under > the bridge. However, I'm revisiting several aspects of the fundamental > architecture of Puffin to allow for such things as Email-based test actions, > so I am in as good a position to change as ever I will be. I'll take another > pass through the WebUnit docs, etc and see what it would take to replace > what I have. Especially, if it were to give me stuff like NT > Challenge/Response support, I may be VERY interested as this is a complete > pain I've not incorporated yet.
My impression of WebUnit is that it's not being actively developed (though still maintained, I think), and the one thing it does is HTTPSession -- which is good and useful, but you shouldn't feel intimidated by it; it's easy code, and if you are familiar with httplib you'll be able to understand everything httpsession does very easily (and you may already be doing most of what it's doing). Ian _______________________________________________________________ Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm _______________________________________________ Webware-discuss mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webware-discuss
