On Monday 12 August 2002 06:05 am, Geoff Talvola wrote: > I take it you don't want the overhead of calling a method, otherwise > you would have just defined a method that returned a bool.
Correct. > One possibility without changing the PSP syntax is to write 2 base > classes in a Python module, whose sole purpose is to provide a > setting for shouldFooBar. Then multiply inherit from the appropriate > base class: For my foo.psp, I simply created a "foo_base.py" in the same directory to set the value and in the psp said: <%@ page extends="foo_base" %> I still think <psp:set> should exist for the same reasons the docs say that <psp:method> exists. Obviously, this is merely a refinement, not anything critical. -Chuck ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Webware-discuss mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webware-discuss
