I think you're right that Dynamic sessions were buggy some time in the past. But I don't know if that applies to 0.7 or not.
You're right that it's hard to run a production site on a changing codebase. We need more frequent releases, or at the very least we should put a CVS tag on a known stable version of Webware so people can pull it from CVS without potentially getting broken code that was just checked in. - Geoff > -----Original Message----- > From: Matt Feifarek [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, December 10, 2002 11:26 PM > To: Geoffrey Talvola > Cc: 'Hancock, David (DHANCOCK)'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Webware-discuss] Dynamic sessions don't work? > > > Geoffrey Talvola wrote: > > >Dynamic sessions work just fine with the latest CVS as far > as I can tell. > >Matt, what makes you think they are broken? > > > I'm not using CVS; I'm using the latest released version. > It's hard run > production sites on a changing codebase, even though yes, it's pretty > stable. > > I can't recall specifically, but there has been some discussion of > dynamic sessions being "broken". Now, I can't recall if that > was pre-0.7 > or not... and the only reference to anything like that was > around 4/1... > > so, maybe I'm wrong. I don't remember the nature of the bug, > or what the > deal was, but I thought that I remembered that someone > in-the-know said > "just use Memory sessions". > > Perhaps that was a long time ago; sorry if I led anyone astray. > > ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by: With Great Power, Comes Great Responsibility Learn to use your power at OSDN's High Performance Computing Channel http://hpc.devchannel.org/ _______________________________________________ Webware-discuss mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webware-discuss
