Geoffrey Talvola [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > I think Webware has matured to the point of diminishing returns -- it works > well enough that there's not much payoff in enhancing it further :-)
There have been some pretty big changes in certain areas between 0.8.1 and CVS, though. Perhaps the people who actually use Webware for real-world stuff (unlike me) just track CVS, but I've been pleasantly surprised by some of the enhancements. Some things still annoy me, though - contexts seem to override packages of the same name - eg. set up a context called mypackage and then attempt to import the genuine mypackage within the context's code. > I'd love to see better docs, more users, code cleanup, a strong core group > of developers with the time and energy to review bug reports and patches > frequently, a test suite, and a 1.0 release. But even if none of those > things happen, I'll still be happy with Webware and will continue to use > it. Not strictly related to test suites, but I've been working on a simple meta-framework which covers Webware and some of the other Web frameworks. Hopefully, I'll release something for the Web-SIG to criticise later in the week, if only to reinvigorate the stalled discussions on common APIs which didn't seem to get any further than a ridiculously simple single function signature and lots of talk about threading models. Paul ------------------------------------------------------- The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA. http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn _______________________________________________ Webware-discuss mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webware-discuss
