On Thu, Feb 19, 2004 at 01:48:48PM -0500, Shane Hathaway wrote: > If the above guess is correct, you would benefit from the experimental > support for binding transactions to connections (like Kapil mentioned.)
As a data point, this "experimental" support in my experience works *really* well, and we've got tens of people hammering all day creating and changing objects (the largest BTree has just gone over 100,000 items and growing 1000 objects/week). > The API is still experimental because connection-bound transactions really > ought to be set up at the time you open the database, not when you open > the connection. The API is simple enough that we haven't had a strong > reason to fix it, though. Because I use them via IndexedCatalog's Shelf, it appears to us as if the setting is bound to the database itself, but you're right; mixing local transactions with non-local ones may be a problem I hadn't considered yet. Take care, -- Christian Robottom Reis | http://async.com.br/~kiko/ | [+55 16] 261 2331 ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now. Build and deploy apps & Web services for Linux with a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1356&alloc_id=3438&op=click _______________________________________________ Webware-discuss mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webware-discuss
