On 8/6/04 at 12:45 PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: >With respect to templates I would like to see more links on methods of >integration because personally I don't think that it is a one-size fits >all world especially with webware. cheetah is a nice example, I've seen >Max's code and have implimented a version of it at our site, but still >somewhat different then the way Max has done it (or at least different >from the way I think he did it).
I agree wholeheartedly on providing a mix of template solutions. With recipes on the various ways to use them. (I'll write one on the way we use them here. It's similar, too, to Max's code.) >> -------- Original Message -------- >> Subject: Re: [Webware-discuss] Towards a new release: request for >> thought and discussion >> From: "Max Ischenko" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Date: Fri, August 06, 2004 1:34 am >> To: >> Cc: "WebWare mailing list" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> >> Matt Feifarek wrote: >> >> > 1. remove all non-core "kits" like middlekit, comkit, taskkit, userkit, >> > etc. When there is a dependency on one of them for Webkit, fix the >> > dependency. To the extent that these projects have interest (like >> > MiddleKit) spin them into their own projects. I would consider the TaskKit as "core" to the project, at least for what we do with it, but also I think it's used by the session sweeper isn't it? --Tracy ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by OSTG. Have you noticed the changes on Linux.com, ITManagersJournal and NewsForge in the past few weeks? Now, one more big change to announce. We are now OSTG- Open Source Technology Group. Come see the changes on the new OSTG site. www.ostg.com _______________________________________________ Webware-discuss mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webware-discuss
