Thanks, Matt--that's useful. We never (purposely) put anything but strings
into the session store, so that skews our results in the "good" direction.
Cheers!
--
David Hancock
-----Original Message-----
From: Matt Feifarek [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wed 10/20/2004 6:12 PM
To: Hancock, David (DHANCOCK)
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Webware-discuss] session strangeness
Thanks for that.
I guess that it's not "way" :-)
But it does depend on what gets pickled; if it stays in memory, there's
no pickling. I've noticed for example that pickling new style classes
(with the getstate/setstate stuff) is pretty slow. Typical session stuff
like strings and ints should be no problem.
Hancock, David (DHANCOCK) wrote:
>With other factors held constant, File vs. Dynamic resulted in a 16%
>decrease in the benchmark's performance (one of the Webware example
>pages, 20,000 requests, 10 concurrently. That 16% may be what Matt had
>in mind as "way slower" but I thought it might help to put a number on
>it.
>
>
>
>
Title: RE: [Webware-discuss] session strangeness
- [Webware-discuss] session strangeness JD Kaplan
- RE: [Webware-discuss] session strangeness JD Kaplan
- RE: [Webware-discuss] session strangeness jose
- RE: [Webware-discuss] session strange... JD Kaplan
- Re: [Webware-discuss] session strange... Matt Feifarek
- RE: [Webware-discuss] session strangeness Geoffrey Talvola
- RE: [Webware-discuss] session strangeness Hancock, David \(DHANCOCK\)
- Re: [Webware-discuss] session strange... Matt Feifarek
- RE: [Webware-discuss] session strangeness Hancock, David \(DHANCOCK\)
- RE: [Webware-discuss] session strange... jkaplan
- RE: [Webware-discuss] session str... Ben Parker
- RE: [Webware-discuss] session... jkaplan
