Matt Feifarek wrote: > Hi Chas. > > Perhaps the developers can chime in on the version numbering, but I'd > say that it may be this: although the framework is quite stable, I > know that there are some things that we all want it to be that it is > not yet, so I expect this explains the wait for v 1.0. > > I'm glad that you're giving it a try. I think that you'll find it a > pleasure to work with.
I think Webware needs an automated test suite and better documentation in order to be considered 1.0. The time is way overdue for a new release from the tip of CVS too, but that won't happen until a new volunteer steps forward because none of the developers (myself included) currently seems to have the time or inclination to do it. - Geoff ------------------------------------------------------- This Newsletter Sponsored by: Macrovision For reliable Linux application installations, use the industry's leading setup authoring tool, InstallShield X. Learn more and evaluate today. http://clk.atdmt.com/MSI/go/ins0030000001msi/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Webware-discuss mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webware-discuss
