Oliver Bock wrote: > I suggest 2.3 rather than 2.4. People on shared hosting accounts are > often stuck with a none-too-recent version. Also, you'll get clueless > complaints from OS X users (Tiger includes Python 2.3), ...
We have discussed this on webware-devel, too. Distributions such as Debian stable, SLES and RHEL also move very slowly. I currently have the vague idea to make a Webware 1.0 branch that requires Python 2.4 and brings some major changes (standard installer etc.). This will not happen so quickly however and by the time 1.0 will be released, Python 2.3 will be probably completely outdated. If 1.0 takes too long, we could make some intermediate releases in the 0.9.x branch that would still run on Python 2.3. How does this sound? -- Chris ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Webware-discuss mailing list Webware-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webware-discuss
