sophana wrote: > I did a tour of the numerous python web framworks available not so long > ago. I choosed webware, because it is simple and powerful.
Yes, I think that's still true, but today there are really many great alternatives. E.g. for my next project I chose TurboGears. I'm curious how it will compare to Webware. One problem with TurboGears is that it is much more difficult to keep up-to-date with current development and changes. If you're running your own server, that's ok, but if you deliver software that other people have to install on their servers, that may be a problem. Some major changes will happen even after the TurboGears 1.0 release which is still not available and documentation is lagging behind. It may be a good idea to replace Kid with Markup, and maybe also SQLObject with SQLAlchemy, or have them as alternatives. But I'm also curious about Tim's choice. Besides TurboGears, there's also Django, Pylons and many other frameworks. (BTW: Don't worry, I'll continue to maintain Webware releases, even if I'll use other frameworks for new projects.) -- Chris ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Webware-discuss mailing list Webware-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webware-discuss
