> >Well, that's not true. You can call "isCommand(<name>)" to determine >which command is being invoked. >
Hmm... this must me something new, as this was not in there originally. This being the case, I see no problem in automatically calling validate from execute in all cases (cda/non cda). > >>I have recently done integration with formproc. Amazingly it's just one >>class and requires no changes to WW. I'll commit tonight if you guys >>like the idea. > >Can you give us an example here first? > Sure.. First, read this page first http://formproc.sourceforge.net/docs/guide.html so you become familiar with the feature... formproc has the concept of defining a form in an xml file, so I created a GenericValidator class that can be invoked from any action that extends ActionSupport, like this.. inside your doValidation() just have a single line: GenericValidator.validate(this,formName,getLocale()); This simple call will validate your form according to your formproc form definition based on the formName you specify. Upon returning, if there was an error, error messages (if any) will be populated inside the action just like if you had done the validation manually. I have a special lightweight version of formproc that doesn't use any of the dependencies of the original one (as the original one requires edenlib, xerces, jdom [blah!]). This is all part of my personal stash, so if you have no use for this or find that reinventing the wheel is much better, that's ok :) /V _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp. _______________________________________________ Webwork-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webwork-user
