I want action chaining!!!!!!!! Don't scrap it!!!!!! :) I'll come up with good examples in a few days, just let me get through these midterms this week, then I'll have some compelling arguments.
-Pat >From: "Matt Baldree" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: "Webwork-Developer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, >"Webwork-User" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: [Webwork-user] feature request update >Date: Sun, 5 May 2002 16:33:59 -0500 > >[chain actions] >I proto the chain action feature but I was unable to convince myself that >there is a compelling reason to have this over what we have now. Nor was >anybody able to present a compelling argument for this. So for now I tabled >this and am moving on to other requests. > >[attachment aware action] >I'm now looking at the AttachmentAware request and would like to solicit >some input on it. I definitely think this is needed because it is so >commonly used and would provide a great benefit. So the need for this is a >no brainer IMO. I'm soliciting developers who have already implemented this >to some degree that would like to donate their code and/or work with me on >this. > >-Matt > > > > >_______________________________________________________________ > >Have big pipes? SourceForge.net is looking for download mirrors. We supply >the hardware. You get the recognition. Email Us: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >_______________________________________________ >Webwork-user mailing list >[EMAIL PROTECTED] >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webwork-user _________________________________________________________________ Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com _______________________________________________________________ Have big pipes? SourceForge.net is looking for download mirrors. We supply the hardware. You get the recognition. Email Us: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Webwork-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webwork-user
