As someone from the OpenSymphony camp and a very big fan of WebWork, you get my +1.
Though I would like to point out that if WW is under the same umbrella as the other OSym tools it does not mean you have to start using them (or vice-versa). Oh yeah, please don't impose the com.opensymphony package namespace on WebWork (or in fact any rules)! Cheers, -Joe Walnes On Mon, 01 July 2002, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote > Ok. It's time to bring up a former heated subject. Back > in March, there was a topic concerning moving WW under > Opensymphony. The conclusion of the debate was just to > hang out and wait. Since then, a lot has changed and I > think it is time to bring this subject up again. I > think WW could benefit from the exposure, common > infrastructure, developers, etc. > > So, I'll start off and say +1. What do you say? ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Webwork-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webwork-user
