Yeah! +1 from me too. I'm currently investigating Webwork for a new project (I used Struts before).
Mathias ------------------------ Joe Walnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: ------------------------ As someone from the OpenSymphony camp and a very big fan of WebWork, you >get my +1. > >Though I would like to point out that if WW is under the same umbrella as >the other OSym tools it does not mean you have to start using them (or >vice-versa). > >Oh yeah, please don't impose the com.opensymphony package namespace on >WebWork (or in fact any rules)! > >Cheers, >-Joe Walnes > >On Mon, 01 July 2002, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote > > Ok. It's time to bring up a former heated subject. Back > > in March, there was a topic concerning moving WW under > > Opensymphony. The conclusion of the debate was just to > > hang out and wait. Since then, a lot has changed and I > > think it is time to bring this subject up again. I > > think WW could benefit from the exposure, common > > infrastructure, developers, etc. > > > > So, I'll start off and say +1. What do you say? > > > >------------------------------------------------------- >This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek >Welcome to geek heaven. >http://thinkgeek.com/sf >_______________________________________________ >Opensymphony-developers mailing list >[EMAIL PROTECTED] >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-developers ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Webwork-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webwork-user
