Yes because WW is providing a wrapper around HTTP Session. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ryan LeCompte" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 6:39 PM Subject: [Webwork-user] Session (Map) contents.
> > Hello, > > > I'm curious... do the objects that are stored in the > session object within an action required to implement the > java.io.Serializable interface? I know that objects placed > in HttpSession must be, but it appears that WebWork presents > the programmer with just a plain Map. Do the rules still > apply? > > Thanks, > > Ryan LeCompte > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://www.louisiana.edu/~rml7669 > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > Stuff, things, and much much more. > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > _______________________________________________ > Webwork-user mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webwork-user > > ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by: Jabber - The world's fastest growing real-time communications platform! Don't just IM. Build it in! http://www.jabber.com/osdn/xim _______________________________________________ Webwork-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webwork-user
