Title: Message
Gregory
There is a difference between compound authorizations (one authorization for several things, which is prohibited) and several authorizations on the same piece of paper (which is OK, just so long as each one has an indication that it was individually considered).  To make it clear that each authorization is separate, you could enclose each in a box.
 
Previous discusson on this listserve asked the question if the piece of paper could be signed once, and then each other area initialed, and the conclusion seemed to be 'Yes' (to my understanding, anyhow).  It would be a good idea to allow for Patient and Subscriber signatures and/or initials separately.
 
The opinions expressed here are my own and not necessarily the opinion of LCMH.
 
Douglas M. Webb
Computer System Engineer
Little Company of Mary Hospital & Health Care Centers
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
"This electronic message may contain information that is confidential and/or legally privileged. It is intended only for the use of the individual(s) and entity(s)  named as recipients in the message. If you are not an intended recipient of the message, please notify the sender immediately,  delete the material from any computer, do not deliver, distribute, or copy this message, and do not disclose its contents or take action in reliance on the information it contains. Thank you."
 

 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Friday, March 28, 2003 08:35 AM
Subject: RE: Multiagency authorizations

I know a lot of hospitals that are disregarding this point.  More often than not I understand that many of my clients have decided to piggy-back the NPP receipt verification along with their existing Treatment Authorization forms, but I suppose this is a matter of how you look at it.  The treatment authorization form may not have information regarding your notice of privacy, but can your notice of privacy include a consent for treatment? 
 
I suppose this argument could be made?
 
Again, the spirit of these regulations is to simplify healthcare, and protect patient rights. 
 

Greg Park
Product Manager
DB Technology Inc.
Office:          800-760-4096 x117
Cell:             484-919-0392
PA Office:     610-397-0288

www.dbtech.com

-----Original Message-----
From: Schmitt, Laura A. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2003 8:49 PM
To: WEDI SNIP Privacy Workgroup List
Subject: Multiagency authorizations

Several people on our HIPAA implementation team are hoping others input might help in resolving our question about HIPAA's instructions to avoid compound authorizations and how that relate to the use of multi-agency authorization forms. 
 
The final HIPAA Privacy regulations - 164.508 (b)(3) - prohibit the use of compound authorizations (i.e., combining with any other document an authorization for use or disclosure of phi...except for limited and specific exceptions).  
 
We are a county-operated yet multi-jurisdictional behavioral health organization that plans, contracts, and directly provides treatment & prevention services. We are one of several covered health care components of our County government's hybrid entity. Much of the clinical work we do is as part of collaborative teams with other organizations (i.e., court staff, county social service staff, coordinating offices that serve as fundors, and other community groups, agencies & service providers).
 
In the past, the local human service organizations that staffed such efforts agreed to use a multi-agency "Universal" authorization form. This form includes checkboxes for the various organizations involved, and then all of the other listed elements of a valid authorization. The clinical staff point out the obvious benefit that staff and the client need only sign one form. 
 
The other point of view is that proffered by our MIS vendor and endorsed by several groups similar to ours in the state is the single purpose release forms, which allow for only one-on-one exchanges of information between entities. This option assuries that the system records the limits of each release individually. Primarily the technical staff consider the single agent/purpose release form to conform to the spirit of the regulations...but clinicians believe that they will create an overwhelming paperwork burden on staff & clients. 
 
I've found the language of this section confusing, and would be interested in knowing how others have interpreted this section and resolved the issue of handling releases of information when working with clients involved with numerous organizations. 
 
Thanks in advance for any insights you can offer.
 
Laura Schmitt, Business Analyst
Fairfax-Falls Church Community Services Board

_______________________________________
This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. Thank you.
---
The WEDI SNIP listserv to which you are subscribed is not moderated. The discussions on this listserv therefore represent the views of the individual participants, and do not necessarily represent the views of the WEDI Board of Directors nor WEDI SNIP. If you wish to receive an official opinion, post your question to the WEDI SNIP Issues Database at http://snip.wedi.org/tracking/. These listservs should not be used for commercial marketing purposes or discussion of specific vendor products and services. They also are not intended to be used as a forum for personal disagreements or unprofessional communication at any time.

You are currently subscribed to wedi-privacy as: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe from this list, go to the Subscribe/Unsubscribe form at http://subscribe.wedi.org or send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If you need to unsubscribe but your current email address is not the same as the address subscribed to the list, please use the Subscribe/Unsubscribe form at http://subscribe.wedi.org
---
The WEDI SNIP listserv to which you are subscribed is not moderated. The discussions on this listserv therefore represent the views of the individual participants, and do not necessarily represent the views of the WEDI Board of Directors nor WEDI SNIP. If you wish to receive an official opinion, post your question to the WEDI SNIP Issues Database at http://snip.wedi.org/tracking/. These listservs should not be used for commercial marketing purposes or discussion of specific vendor products and services. They also are not intended to be used as a forum for personal disagreements or unprofessional communication at any time.

You are currently subscribed to wedi-privacy as: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe from this list, go to the Subscribe/Unsubscribe form at http://subscribe.wedi.org or send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If you need to unsubscribe but your current email address is not the same as the address subscribed to the list, please use the Subscribe/Unsubscribe form at http://subscribe.wedi.org

Reply via email to