Hello all,

This is just a reminder that the Testing SWG bi-weekly conference call is
scheduled for tomorrow (August 28th) at 11:30 a.m. eastern time.  The call
in number is 703-736-7290 pc 1315339.  The agenda will be as follows:

1)  Roll Call (5 mins)
2)  Introducing Mark Charles as New Co-Chair(5 mins)
3)  Review Status of Issue from Issues Database(5 mins)
4)  Review Survey Two Summary (inserted below) and Interpretations (15 mins)
5)  Discuss Potential Next Product Directions (inserted below) (25 mins)
6)  Miscellaneous Items (5 mins)


Please join us and help make a difference,

Thanks!
Ed

Edward A. Hafner
Foresight Corporation
Chief Technology Officer
+1.614.791.1600




Proposed Survey Two Summary Results (if you like the proposed detail conclusions, 
please e-mail but you have to promise to be on the call!):


The second survey conducted by the Transaction Testing workgroup is now available at 
xxxx.xxxx.xxxx.  The survey's intentions are to learn about the challenges associated 
with gaining HIPAA compliance and discover production practices across the country.   
Based on these results, the team will be creating work products and probing deeper 
with additional surveys.  We appreciate each of the 129 organizations that 
contributed.  The survey has a strong balance between Payers, Providers, and Vendors.  
We hope these results prove useful to your organization.  

Compared with the first survey that was conducted in April, organizations are moving 
along with their HIPAA programs as a large percentage of payers (56%) and vendors 
(60%) are currently conducting third party testing.  Providers also report progress 
beyond the initial implementation stages towards the development stage (23%) and 
partner testing (40%).  

The number one concern among each organization type is "Trading Partners Are Not 
Ready".  When queried about confidence in clearinghouses, only 19% were concerned 
although 27% preferred to be neutral.   The good news is that vendors, payers, and 
clearinghouse along with a number of providers are making strong progress towards 
partner testing. There are a number of providers that will be challenged to be ready 
by October 16th, but progress is being achieved.  Since most of these responses came 
from WEDi members, the provider results need to be tempered as members represent more 
of the early adopters.

On production implementation practices, we discovered a number of interesting 
observations.    Payers reported in at 44% in strictly following edits while 31% will 
follow most edits, 21% will relax edits but warn when relaxed edits are violated, and 
4% will just relax edits.  A majority of organizations (59%) are using either 997 or 
997 with proprietary reports to communicate non-compliance at types 1 through 7.  The 
unsolicited 277 that reports errors at the claim level is gaining acceptance with 17% 
of the payers.  The 824 transaction currently has a low adoption (4%) although it is 
not currently approved for HIPAA.  There are many providers (50%) that have not 
considered their approach to communicating errors.

Also included in the survey results are external testing practices, third party 
testing practices, implementation approaches, additional compliance challenges, and 
much more detail including graphs and charts.  We encourage you to download the survey 
report and provide us input over the Testing List-Server and during the Thursday 
Testing calls.

 

Examples of Potential Next Products:

* White Paper: Proven Partner Testing Methodologies (Paper would consist of 
contributions from successful health care organizations on their best partner testing 
practices)

* White Paper: Non-Compliance Reporting (Since the current HIPAA Implementation Guides 
do not explicitly recommend how to report non-compliance, this paper would recommend 
an approach to effectively communicate errors)

* White Paper: Dealing with Relaxing Edits (From the survey, 56% of the payers and 61% 
of the total respondents will relax edits in varying degrees.  This paper will deal 
with the transition to follow full compliance)

* Survey 3 Possible Topics:
-Delve deeper into third party testing
-Continue to measure implementation progress
-Understand the nature of edits being relaxed
-Determine why many payers are not relaxing partner testing when partners have tested 
with a third party 





---
The WEDI SNIP listserv to which you are subscribed is not moderated. The discussions 
on this listserv therefore represent the views of the individual participants, and do 
not necessarily represent the views of the WEDI Board of Directors nor WEDI SNIP. If 
you wish to receive an official opinion, post your question to the WEDI SNIP Issues 
Database at http://snip.wedi.org/tracking/.   These listservs should not be used for 
commercial marketing purposes or discussion of specific vendor products and services.  
They also are not intended to be used as a forum for personal disagreements or 
unprofessional communication at any time.

You are currently subscribed to wedi-testing as: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe from this list, go to the Subscribe/Unsubscribe form at 
http://subscribe.wedi.org or send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If you need to unsubscribe but your current email address is not the same as the 
address subscribed to the list, please use the Subscribe/Unsubscribe form at 
http://subscribe.wedi.org

Reply via email to