URL: <http://savannah.nongnu.org/bugs/?31572>
Summary: irc_server infolist stores invalid nick_modes with inspircd ircops Project: WeeChat Submitted by: voidzero Submitted on: Sat Nov 6 21:31:18 2010 Category: irc plugin Severity: 3 - Normal Item Group: other Status: None Privacy: Public Assigned to: None Originator Name: Originator Email: Open/Closed: Open Discussion Lock: Any Release: dev IRC nick: voidzero _______________________________________________________ Details: inspircd has two kinds of usermodes: normal usermodes and, for ircops, snomasks. Example: /mode ircop +w This, as we know, allows ircop to receive wallops. The snomask works a bit differently: /mode ircop +s +AaNn-Cc This sets a snomask, adding the modes A, a, N and N and removing the modes Cc. When an ircop does /oper he gets more usermodes and this snomask is first set: /oper ircop password --> | :server MODE ircop :+o --> | :server 381 ircop :You are now an IRCop --> | :ircop!ir...@somehost MODE ircop -i+ISWhows +aAkKlLoOxfjJgG Let's view usermodes <-- | MODE ircop --> | :server 221 ircop :+ISWhorsw --> | :server 008 ircop +AGJKLNOafgjklnotx :Server notice mask So our usermode is: +ISWhorsw +AGJKLNOafgjklnotx What does the irc_server infolist think our usermode is? nick_modes....................: str 'xrosaAkKlLOfjJgGhwISWnNt' What should it be? nick_modes....................: str 'ISWhorsw' and an additional nick_snomask nick_snomask..................: str 'AGJKLNOafgjklnotx' I realise that this might raise problems. How would you know when mode +s is a snomask and when it is simply a usermode without the extra flags? _______________________________________________________ Reply to this item at: <http://savannah.nongnu.org/bugs/?31572> _______________________________________________ Message sent via/by Savannah http://savannah.nongnu.org/ _______________________________________________ Weechat-dev mailing list Weechat-dev@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/weechat-dev