..there's also this interesting page:
https://whynothugo.nl/journal/2022/07/26/meson-for-python-applications/

On Sun, Nov 6, 2022 at 2:57 PM Joel Bion <[email protected]> wrote:

> I've been wondering about the big changeover that will occur with Python
> 3.12 (the removal of distutils). I use three packages that are Python
> applications that need to configure things at a system level: fail2ban,
> ufw, weewx.
>
> On the ufw git site, this page has a rather interesting conversation
> going. In it, they state that certain packages may want to move to
> non-Python build system (such as meson)... The page with this discussion
> is: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ufw/+bug/1962732
>
>
>
> On Sun, Nov 6, 2022 at 2:07 PM Tom Keffer <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Doug: Yes: you'd either install using pip, or a package installer (apt,
>> yum, etc.). I'd sure like to get out of the business of custom installs
>> and, instead, rely on Python tools and all their goodness.
>>
>> Vince: The thinking is that the config file, skins, and database would
>> all be initialized on first use, using the supplied readonly data as
>> templates. The problem is that it's hard to get weewxd going without doing
>> some customization, albeit via a series of prompts the way setup.py works
>> now.
>>
>> Alternatively, after the pip install, but before first use, the user
>> would be expected to "initialize" or "customize" the install via a tool,
>> which is when these resources would be copied into place.
>>
>> The advantage of either of these approaches is that it mirrors what the
>> package installers do now, so it eliminates a lot of custom code.
>>
>> The last possibility, albeit not the supported approach, is to do what I
>> do most of the time: run right out of the git repository.
>>
>> I hear you on the complexity of Python packaging. I've been using node
>> for a few years now and they have done a much better job. Unfortunately,
>> the Python gods have decided to create a backend standard (PEP 517
>> <https://peps.python.org/pep-0517/>), and then rely on a 3rd party
>> ecosystem to do the actual packaging.
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Nov 6, 2022 at 1:32 PM Vince Skahan <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Wow if you drill down through that thread it gets crazy confusing....but 
>>> (this
>>> one)
>>> <https://discuss.python.org/t/should-there-be-a-new-standard-for-installing-arbitrary-data-files/7853/12>
>>> does help a little although (this other one)
>>> <https://discuss.python.org/t/modernising-my-packages-am-i-thinking-about-this-all-wrong/14558>
>>> got me confused again.  Seems like untrodden ground.
>>>
>>> That whole forum tagged with Packaging there can sure make your head
>>> spin !
>>>
>>> On Sunday, November 6, 2022 at 11:55:38 AM UTC-8 Tom Keffer wrote:
>>>
>>>> installs can only be done within "sys.prefix
>>>> <https://docs.python.org/3/library/sys.html#sys.prefix>". You can't
>>>> just roam around the file system and install things wherever you like. 
>>>> Hence,
>>>> a more unixy setup could not be done with pip, even if we wanted to.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Got it - but we're not installing a python 'module' here.  We're
>>> installing a pure python 'application' that is massively configurable by
>>> the user.  How do you do both ?
>>>
>>> Would it be a multi-step installation ala:
>>>
>>>    - install unconfigured weewx as a library under
>>>    /usr/lib/python3/dist-packages or the like (raspi example)
>>>    - and then have a utility therein that writes a customized config to
>>>    /home/weewx like it does now ?
>>>    - and how would skins, services, extensions, etc. be
>>>    installed/uninstalled/enabled/disabled/edited ?
>>>
>>> Guess I'm lost here for how we'd mechanically do a future installation
>>> updating a current very tweaked setup.py installation....or even how would
>>> I build one up from scratch.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups "weewx-development" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>> an email to [email protected].
>>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/weewx-development/c128da8b-3837-4feb-be89-04a8d3dbf35cn%40googlegroups.com
>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/weewx-development/c128da8b-3837-4feb-be89-04a8d3dbf35cn%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>> .
>>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "weewx-development" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to [email protected].
>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/weewx-development/CAPq0zEAKrYy72i4n%3DzvcCxjJ6St5MvSaaZYtqTVvpwdiTCHPug%40mail.gmail.com
>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/weewx-development/CAPq0zEAKrYy72i4n%3DzvcCxjJ6St5MvSaaZYtqTVvpwdiTCHPug%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>> .
>>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"weewx-development" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/weewx-development/CAGVdbe0geAmKk9rw4yz6Oo7NWVExe%2BM0azxidq9_jD43Lx8jew%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to