i think Wind is ok here with x version.

Oct  6 14:06:41 meteo weewx[16870]: wmr300x: read counts; Loop: 134; TH_0: 
10; TH_1: 16; TH_2: 10; TH_3: 10; TH_4: 10; TH_5: 10; TH_6: 10; TH_7: 10; 
TH_8: 10; barom: 10; forecast: 11; rain: 12; wind: 16; x57: 1
Oct  6 14:06:41 meteo weewx[16870]: wmr300x: write counts; xa6: 1
Oct  6 14:07:01 meteo weewx[16870]: wmr300x: read counts; Loop: 134; TH_0: 
10; TH_1: 16; TH_2: 10; TH_3: 10; TH_4: 10; TH_5: 10; TH_6: 10; TH_7: 10; 
TH_8: 10; barom: 10; forecast: 10; rain: 12; wind: 16
Oct  6 14:07:01 meteo weewx[16870]: wmr300x: write counts;
Oct  6 14:07:21 meteo weewx[16870]: wmr300x: read counts; Loop: 135; TH_0: 
10; TH_1: 17; TH_2: 10; TH_3: 10; TH_4: 10; TH_5: 10; TH_6: 10; TH_7: 10; 
TH_8: 10; barom: 10; forecast: 10; rain: 12; wind: 16; x57: 1
Oct  6 14:07:21 meteo weewx[16870]: wmr300x: write counts; xa6: 1
Oct  6 14:07:41 meteo weewx[16870]: wmr300x: read counts; Loop: 135; TH_0: 
11; TH_1: 16; TH_2: 10; TH_3: 10; TH_4: 10; TH_5: 10; TH_6: 10; TH_7: 10; 
TH_8: 10; barom: 10; forecast: 11; rain: 12; wind: 16; x57: 1
Oct  6 14:07:41 meteo weewx[16870]: wmr300x: write counts; xa6: 1
Oct  6 14:08:01 meteo weewx[16870]: wmr300x: read counts; Loop: 135; TH_0: 
10; TH_1: 16; TH_2: 10; TH_3: 10; TH_4: 10; TH_5: 10; TH_6: 10; TH_7: 11; 
TH_8: 10; barom: 10; forecast: 10; rain: 12; wind: 16; x57: 1
Oct  6 14:08:01 meteo weewx[16870]: wmr300x: write counts; xa6: 1
Oct  6 14:08:21 meteo weewx[16870]: wmr300x: read counts; Loop: 134; TH_0: 
10; TH_1: 16; TH_2: 10; TH_3: 10; TH_4: 10; TH_5: 10; TH_6: 10; TH_7: 10; 
TH_8: 10; barom: 10; forecast: 10; rain: 12; wind: 16; x57: 1
Oct  6 14:08:21 meteo weewx[16870]: wmr300x: write counts; xa6: 1
Oct  6 14:08:41 meteo weewx[16870]: wmr300x: read counts; Loop: 134; TH_0: 
10; TH_1: 16; TH_2: 10; TH_3: 10; TH_4: 10; TH_5: 10; TH_6: 10; TH_7: 10; 
TH_8: 10; barom: 10; forecast: 11; rain: 12; wind: 16; x57: 1
Oct  6 14:08:41 meteo weewx[16870]: wmr300x: write counts; xa6: 1
Oct  6 14:09:01 meteo weewx[16870]: wmr300x: read counts; Loop: 134; TH_0: 
10; TH_1: 16; TH_2: 10; TH_3: 10; TH_4: 10; TH_5: 10; TH_6: 10; TH_7: 10; 
TH_8: 10; barom: 10; forecast: 10; rain: 12; wind: 16; x57: 1
Oct  6 14:09:01 meteo weewx[16870]: wmr300x: write counts; xa6: 1


El sábado, 6 de octubre de 2018, 11:20:27 (UTC+2), Juan Antonio Mosquera 
escribió:
>
> It's weird, it seems that wind data does read no?
>
>
> Oct 06 11:17:13 meteomontaos weewx[10621]: wmr300x: read counts; Loop: 
> 135; TH_0: 11; TH_1: 16; TH_2: 10; TH_3: 10; TH_4: 10; TH_5: 10; TH_6: 10; 
> TH_7: 10; TH_8: 10; barom: 10; forecast: 12; rain: 12; wind: 16; x57: 1
> Oct 06 11:17:13 meteomontaos weewx[10621]: wmr300x: write counts; xa6: 1
> Oct 06 11:17:33 meteomontaos weewx[10621]: wmr300x: read counts; Loop: 
> 135; TH_0: 10; TH_1: 16; TH_2: 11; TH_3: 10; TH_4: 10; TH_5: 10; TH_6: 10; 
> TH_7: 10; TH_8: 10; barom: 10; forecast: 10; rain: 12; wind: 16; x57: 1
> Oct 06 11:17:33 meteomontaos weewx[10621]: wmr300x: write counts; xa6: 1
> Oct 06 11:17:53 meteomontaos weewx[10621]: wmr300x: read counts; Loop: 
> 134; TH_0: 10; TH_1: 16; TH_2: 10; TH_3: 10; TH_4: 10; TH_5: 10; TH_6: 10; 
> TH_7: 10; TH_8: 10; barom: 10; forecast: 10; rain: 12; wind: 16; x57: 1
> Oct 06 11:17:53 meteomontaos weewx[10621]: wmr300x: write counts; xa6: 1
> Oct 06 11:18:14 meteomontaos weewx[10621]: wmr300x: read counts; Loop: 
> 135; TH_0: 10; TH_1: 16; TH_2: 10; TH_3: 11; TH_4: 10; TH_5: 10; TH_6: 10; 
> TH_7: 10; TH_8: 10; barom: 10; forecast: 10; rain: 12; wind: 16
> Oct 06 11:18:14 meteomontaos weewx[10621]: wmr300x: write counts;
> Oct 06 11:18:34 meteomontaos weewx[10621]: wmr300x: read counts; Loop: 
> 136; TH_0: 11; TH_1: 16; TH_2: 10; TH_3: 10; TH_4: 11; TH_5: 10; TH_6: 10; 
> TH_7: 10; TH_8: 10; barom: 10; forecast: 10; rain: 12; wind: 16; x57: 1
> Oct 06 11:18:34 meteomontaos weewx[10621]: wmr300x: write counts; xa6: 1
> Oct 06 11:18:54 meteomontaos weewx[10621]: wmr300x: read counts; Loop: 
> 135; TH_0: 10; TH_1: 16; TH_2: 10; TH_3: 10; TH_4: 10; TH_5: 11; TH_6: 10; 
> TH_7: 10; TH_8: 10; barom: 10; forecast: 10; rain: 12; wind: 16; x57: 1
> Oct 06 11:18:54 meteomontaos weewx[10621]: wmr300x: write counts; xa6: 1
> Oct 06 11:19:14 meteomontaos weewx[10621]: wmr300x: read counts; Loop: 
> 135; TH_0: 10; TH_1: 16; TH_2: 10; TH_3: 10; TH_4: 10; TH_5: 10; TH_6: 11; 
> TH_7: 10; TH_8: 10; barom: 10; forecast: 11; rain: 12; wind: 16; x57: 1
> Oct 06 11:19:14 meteomontaos weewx[10621]: wmr300x: write counts; xa6: 1
> Oct 06 11:19:34 meteomontaos weewx[10621]: wmr300x: read counts; Loop: 
> 134; TH_0: 10; TH_1: 16; TH_2: 10; TH_3: 10; TH_4: 10; TH_5: 10; TH_6: 10; 
> TH_7: 10; TH_8: 10; barom: 10; forecast: 10; rain: 12; wind: 16; x57: 1
> Oct 06 11:19:34 meteomontaos weewx[10621]: wmr300x: write counts; xa6: 1
> Oct 06 11:19:54 meteomontaos weewx[10621]: wmr300x: read counts; Loop: 
> 135; TH_0: 10; TH_1: 16; TH_2: 10; TH_3: 10; TH_4: 10; TH_5: 10; TH_6: 10; 
> TH_7: 11; TH_8: 10; barom: 10; forecast: 10; rain: 12; wind: 16; x57: 1
> Oct 06 11:19:54 meteomontaos weewx[10621]: wmr300x: write counts; xa6: 1
>
>
> Thanks.
>
>
> El jueves, 4 de octubre de 2018, 16:22:22 (UTC+2), Cameron D escribió:
>>
>> The rc5 and rc6 drivers shjipped with the weewx releases had issues 
>> where, after some time (days to weeks) the system would stop reporting any 
>> data.
>> That was addressed in this update of 24th September 
>> <https://groups.google.com/d/topic/weewx-user/jUF4J6tRxPU/discussion>.
>>
>> At least two users have reported a different problem, where there is only 
>> partial loss, for example wind or temperature and humidity.
>>
>>    1. Juan Antonio Mosquera reports wind data missing 
>>    <https://groups.google.com/d/msg/weewx-user/jUF4J6tRxPU/ABecLDR6AQAJ>.
>>    2. Markus Biewer reports temperature/humidity, and sometimes other 
>>    data going missing after about a week 
>>    <https://groups.google.com/d/msg/weewx-user/7QUNDdqbHHE/z7Rr5lqZAgAJ>.
>>
>> Initially it looked like it might have been related to Belchertown skin, 
>> but it is reported to also be an issue with the standard skin.
>>
>> The attached zip file has 3 files:
>>
>>    1. *wmr300-v19rc6+f3.py*  - and updated version of the main wmr300 
>>    driver - this has a couple of minor bug fixes as well as extra diagnostic 
>>    code for this problem.
>>    2. *summ-pkt-data.awk*  -   an awk script to  convert the new 
>>    diagnostic logfile data into a csv file.
>>    3. *wmr300x-v19rc6+f3.py* - note the 'x'. This is the experimental 
>>    driver that uses pyusb 1 and libusb1 if available.  It also contains the 
>>    extra diagnostics, but is included for the other issue where the pi locks 
>>    up completely.
>>    
>> *New Diagnostics*:
>>
>> In your weewx.conf file, enable
>>   debug=1
>>
>> and in the WMR300 section I would suggest the following:
>>     debug_counts = 1
>>     debug_decode = 0
>>     debug_comm = 0
>>     debug_history = 0
>>     debug_timing = 1
>>     debug_rain = 0
>>
>> The debug_counts setting will output a summary of each packet type read 
>> from the USB  in a specified time interval (default 20 seconds) as well as 
>> the number of loop packets sent to weewx.
>>
>> Here is my WMR300 section
>>
>> ##############################################################################
>>
>> [WMR300]
>>     # This section is for WMR300 weather stations
>>
>>     # The station model, e.g., WMR300A
>>     model = WMR300
>>
>>     # The driver to use:
>>     driver = user.wmr300-v19rc6+f3
>>
>>     history_limit = 6
>>
>>     debug_counts = 1
>>     debug_decode = 0
>>     debug_comm = 0
>>     debug_history = 1
>>     debug_timing = 1
>>     debug_rain = 0
>>
>>
>> ##############################################################################
>>
>> Note that I recommend placing these drivers in the "user" directory of 
>> the weewx installation.
>> You can also create a similar section named *[WMR300x]* to use the 
>> experimental driver, and select between them by editing this line in the 
>> *[Station]* section:
>>  station_type = WMR300
>>
>> *Experimental driver:*
>> This driver uses the PyUSB version 1 API, which allows it to use libusb1 
>> or other usb libraries.
>> It will default to libusb1 if possible, but otherwise will fall back to 
>> libusb0.
>>
>> Note that some versions of Ubuntu seemed to ship with a beta version of 
>> PyUSB-1 that did not seem to support the full api.  If it reports a version 
>> beginning "1.0.0b..." then the driver will use libusb0.
>>
>> If you enable the experimental version then check the log file when it 
>> starts up:
>> It will always show pyusb_version, and the experimental driver will print 
>> which usb backend library is selected.
>>
>> grep -i pyusb (your-logfile)
>>
>> will display both.
>>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"weewx-user" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to