Sub-zero seems to work, ws3000 driver values match to what the original display shows. Great :) Winter, I'm ready!
I now changed record_generation = software archive_interval=120 loop_interval=60 USB read & write timeouts = 10000 Oct 29 22:00:03 ripapi weewx[25186]: ws3000: write: 7b 03 40 7d (len=4) Oct 29 22:01:03 ripapi weewx[25186]: ws3000: write: 7b 03 40 7d (len=4) Oct 29 22:01:05 ripapi weewx[25186]: ws3000: write: 7b 03 40 7d (len=4) Oct 29 22:02:05 ripapi weewx[25186]: ws3000: write: 7b 03 40 7d (len=4) Oct 29 22:03:06 ripapi weewx[25186]: ws3000: write: 7b 03 40 7d (len=4) Oct 29 22:03:08 ripapi weewx[25186]: ws3000: write: 7b 03 40 7d (len=4) Oct 29 22:04:08 ripapi weewx[25186]: ws3000: write: 7b 03 40 7d (len=4) Oct 29 22:05:08 ripapi weewx[25186]: ws3000: write: 7b 03 40 7d (len=4) Oct 29 22:05:10 ripapi weewx[25186]: ws3000: write: 7b 03 40 7d (len=4) Oct 29 22:06:10 ripapi weewx[25186]: ws3000: write: 7b 03 40 7d (len=4) Oct 29 22:07:11 ripapi weewx[25186]: ws3000: write: 7b 03 40 7d (len=4) Oct 29 22:07:12 ripapi weewx[25186]: ws3000: write: 7b 03 40 7d (len=4) Oct 29 22:08:13 ripapi weewx[25186]: ws3000: write: 7b 03 40 7d (len=4) Oct 29 22:09:13 ripapi weewx[25186]: ws3000: write: 7b 03 40 7d (len=4) Oct 29 22:09:15 ripapi weewx[25186]: ws3000: write: 7b 03 40 7d (len=4) Oct 29 22:10:16 ripapi weewx[25186]: ws3000: write: 7b 03 40 7d (len=4) Oct 29 22:10:18 ripapi weewx[25186]: ws3000: write: 7b 03 40 7d (len=4) Oct 29 22:11:18 ripapi weewx[25186]: ws3000: write: 7b 03 40 7d (len=4) Oct 29 22:12:18 ripapi weewx[25186]: ws3000: write: 7b 03 40 7d (len=4) Oct 29 22:12:21 ripapi weewx[25186]: ws3000: write: 7b 03 40 7d (len=4) Oct 29 22:13:21 ripapi weewx[25186]: ws3000: write: 7b 03 40 7d (len=4) As every 2nd value is a 'closely timed pair', it really looks like that both, the archive run (120s interval) and loop run (60s interval) read new values from the main unit. And I agree, that best would be to share the 'final files' - but as this still is strongly a 'work in progress', I use the etherpad to collect the 'current best solution'. I wouldn't have the energy to now upload all files publicly available somewhere after every change :) -> Let's try to make this stable and release the files somewhere What RasPi do you have? I have the old RasPi model B rev2 (512MB), if that makes any difference. On Mon, Oct 29, 2018 at 7:11 PM <[email protected]> wrote: > OK, I couldn't let you do all the work alone, so I retrieved my ws3000 and > did some test. Switching to record_generation = software does not prevent > the duplicate loop packets. But I would still change the configuration, > because hardware just doesn't make any sense (if I understand what this > means correctly). I also saw a comment in the documentation mentioning that > 'hardware' could cause issues with one station. > > So far I haven't gotten any crash, so I'll let weewx run for a while, see > if I also get a crash. If not, I'll try to setup my RPi to do the tests. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the > Google Groups "weewx-user" group. > To unsubscribe from this topic, visit > https://groups.google.com/d/topic/weewx-user/qDe-El03C2k/unsubscribe. > To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- | risto h. kurppa | risto at kurppa dot fi | http://risto.kurppa.fi -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "weewx-user" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
