If you care about data integrity, the $50 for a modest UPS is money well
spent!

On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 5:00 PM gjr80 <[email protected]> wrote:

> Yes, the price you pay for using software record generation. Also, I
> forgot about no_catchup being introduced in 3.9.1. That changes the logic
> during a startup catchup, now software record generation will also get
> caught up in the 'timestamp less than final' issue unless you set no_catchup
> = False. But then, as you say, you will miss out on any catchup records
> in timea when you do not have corrupt station memory.
>
> Guess that's why I have a UPS as well :)
>
> Gary
>
> On Thursday, 17 October 2019 09:35:21 UTC+10, Thomas Keffer wrote:
>>
>> Immune, yes, but you also won't get any archive records stored on the
>> logger while your computer is down!
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 4:33 PM gjr80 <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> One other thing to keep in mind; the de facto standard mode of operation
>>> of a Davis station under WeeWX is to use hardware record generation, in
>>> other words WeeWX obtains and stores archive records from from the
>>> console/logger. WeeWX can also operate using software record generation
>>> where only loop packets are obtained from the logger/console and archive
>>> records are synthesised by WeeWX from this data. When the logger
>>> experiences corrupted memory/temporal displacement it almost always
>>> continues to emit loop packets but emits old archive records. So when
>>> operated in software record generation mode WeeWX will essentially be
>>> immune from the corrupted station memory issue. Similarly, other PWS
>>> software that only use loop packets will not be affected by the corrupted
>>> station memory issue.
>>>
>>> I don't see this as a WeeWX bug, rather a limitation of operating in
>>> hardware record generation mode that can be mitigated by reliable power and
>>> clock.
>>>
>>> Gary
>>>
>>> --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups "weewx-user" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>> an email to [email protected].
>>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/weewx-user/e4475612-bb76-4fd2-8e53-dc00286f878d%40googlegroups.com
>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/weewx-user/e4475612-bb76-4fd2-8e53-dc00286f878d%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>> .
>>>
>> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "weewx-user" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/weewx-user/d91c9ec6-6c02-481d-ac73-54675c772b20%40googlegroups.com
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/weewx-user/d91c9ec6-6c02-481d-ac73-54675c772b20%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"weewx-user" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/weewx-user/CAPq0zECKhp6CP6WybUnYWivZzi-wQG3p03MZ39A_pC8Z4qyZeA%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to