Gary, Oh, what a trip this has been. It seems we keep finding other inconsistencies. For both of our sanity sake I will try to keep on topic. It looks like the 24 hour data is good. (Not sure why I was calling it 12)
Thanks for suggesting the debug=1 log. I will try to get it going on time. I think it'll tell us a lot. (but it looks like cwxn doesn't log any info) We'll see what Monday brings. Bill On Friday, February 28, 2020 at 6:24:38 PM UTC-6, gjr80 wrote: > > Bill, > > Perhaps this has all been overtaken by your last three posts. But looking > at your table of data in the first post that 2 hour gap could easily > account for the figures in the table. > > I'm not sure what the 2nd plot in your 2nd post shows; since one goes to > 0.15 and stays there I am guessing that is your day rainfall meteobridge > data on WU. What is the other, 'Prec. Rate' (I think that is what WU calls > it)? Again from the meteobridge? If so that is merely rainfall in the last > hour so I would expect that to go up and down and unlikely to match the > 0.15in. Agree though there appears to be some inconsistency there between > WeeWX and meteobridge/WU, but you would need complete WeeWX data and > meteobridge/WU data from the same period to track down what is going on. It > may create a lot of log chatter but setting debug = 1 just before the rain > hits will give you all the raw data that the interceptor driver receives > from the GW1000 as well as the parsed data passed from the interceptor > driver to WeeWX. > > You've mentioned the '12 hour data' a couple of times. What does that > refer to? As far as I am aware you have 1 hour data, 24 hours data and day > data. > > As for the 2 hour odd outage, what is in the WeeWX logs? Rain went from > 0.01 to 0.09 so clearly WeeWX was receiving data for at least some art of > that period. > > Guess we wait for Monday. > > Gary > > PS. As I understand it the meteobridge obtains its data from the GW1000 > via the GW1000 API whereas WeeWX obtains its data from the GW1000 > differently by intercepting HTTP POSTS made by the GW1000. Ideally they > should provide the same data but it is possible they do not. > > On Saturday, 29 February 2020 08:36:25 UTC+10, Bill Arthur wrote: >> >> It looks like the 12 hour data is good. but I don't understand the 1 >> hour. Rain starts at 15:54 and I would have expected 1hr to track 12hr for >> the first hour. >> But it looks like we have an unexplained stoppage of data from 16:04 to >> 18:08. So I will have to collect data on another day. It should be raining >> on Monday. >> And I' need to find out what caused the two hour outage. >> >> Bill >> >> On Monday, February 24, 2020 at 6:33:29 PM UTC-6, Bill Arthur wrote: >>> >>> I recently added the cwxn extension so that I could pass the weather to >>> my APRS/CWOP app >>> >>> Its working fairly well, but it only reports the current rain rate. The >>> 1hr and 12hr (p and P) are always 000 >>> We had 1.03" today so I had plenty of opportunities to test. The weewx >>> html page shows the rain. >>> >>> Here's my example: >>> Feb 24 2020 18:20 >>> 129/002g004t052r000p000P000h096b10067 >>> >>> I put "binding = archive" in weewx.conf >>> >>> I'm missing something here, any ideas? >>> >>> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "weewx-user" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/weewx-user/0f1881e7-7f65-4c3c-a325-0d8d01bfc27f%40googlegroups.com.
