Alright - I think that indicates that I am going to not bother with weewx. I don't really want to keep sinking money into my weather station and this was very much in the nice to have category. On Thursday, March 19, 2020 at 3:54:24 PM UTC-7, galfert wrote: > > I would forget about trying to interface WeeWx to the Meteobridge. I would > suggest getting a WeatherLink Live and then interfacing that to WeeWx for > your needs. > > You can then keep the Meteobridge as is and doing what it is doing now. Or > you could change things up a bit and gain some added capabilities with the > Meteobridge. > - Change the Meteobridge to get data from the WLL instead of from its RF > antenna and that gains you the following advantages: > > - Indoor temperature will probably be more accurate coming from the > WLL than from the Meteobridge Pro > - Ability to add more sensor options to the WLL that then the > Meteobridge can then also gain. > - Increase the RF distance between Davis sensor transmitters as the > WLL will work up to 1000 ft and the Meteobridge Pro is much less > - Gain the ability to send data to Weatherlink.com via the WLL > - You also open the possibility to also test out other weather > software with the WLL like; Cumulus MX and Weather-Display. > > >
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "weewx-user" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/weewx-user/c3bcefda-6675-4428-ae93-447ba1727335%40googlegroups.com.
