There's two things going on here, lack of a response from CWOP and the missing barometer data. The lack of a CWOP response may be normal CWOP behaviour, hard to say given there was only one CWOP post in that extract posted (the lack of a response only shows if debug >= 2 and CWOP posts only occur every 10 minutes). Given some of your CWOP posts are being accepted either that was a one off or normal behaviour. That is what someone more knowledgeable on CWOP would (may) know. Tom may know. The real issue is the missing barometer data in your CWOP post, that is purely a WeeWX issue and no CWOP knowledge needed.
Gary On Sunday, 26 April 2020 10:21:36 UTC+10, [email protected] wrote: > > > > On 4/25/20 5:17 PM, gjr80 wrote: > > So if I undwerstand the CWOP post contents correctly this would indicate > > that the 1640 post was missing barometer data: > > > > | > > Apr2516:40:24raspberrypi > > > weewx[4325]:restx:CWOP:packet:KQ6UP>APRS,TCPIP*:@252340z3401.26N/11718.84W_328/007g015t097r000p000P000b.....h20L487.weewx-3.9.2-Interceptor#015 > > > > | > > > > but then this > > > > | > > Apr2516:40:25raspberrypi weewx[4325]:restx:CWOP:Connectedto server > > cwop.aprs.net:14580 > > Apr2516:40:45raspberrypi > > weewx[4325]:restx:CWOP:Exception<class'socket.timeout'>(timed > > out)whenlooking forresponse to packet packet > > Apr2516:40:45raspberrypi weewx[4325]:restx:CWOP:Publishedrecord > > 2020-04-2516:40:00PDT (1587858000) > > | > > > > indicates the CWOP data was posted but there was a timeout waiting for a > > response from CWOP. I am not CWOP knowledgeable enough to know whether > > the lack of a response is normal or abnormal behaviour, I'm guessing > > normal. The puzzling part is the lack of barometer data in the CWOP > > post, there appears to be at least one loop packet containing valid > > barometer data that was received during the 1635-1640 archive period. So > > the 1640 archive record should contain barometer data. More thought > needed. > > > > Gary > > > > Now I remember there was connectivity time out issues on my old setup. > So it appears to be working as good as the old setup, but I would like > to resolve this outstanding issues. Who could I contact with a lot of > CWOP expertise? > > Thanks, > Chris KQ6UP > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "weewx-user" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/weewx-user/ae2b5983-05f5-4ab0-88fc-36fab66a3ec4%40googlegroups.com.
