On 4/27/20 1:03 AM, John Ronan wrote: > Morning, > > Apologies, I'm only catching up on posts now > > A few days go I noticed that not all CWOP servers are accepting data. I > haven't heard that the issue has been resolved. > > I don't have a list to hand, but I'll try and find it. > > cwop.ei3rcw.ampr.org is accepting data, you might try testing only on > that one to rule it out. > > Cheers > > John > > EI7IG
That would definitely explain it. Because as far as I can tell all my posts have been successful, but not all of my packets make it out on the APRS net. Also, I have noticed all of the hostnames that I have tried use round robin DNS to distribute the load, but a handful of CWOP-* servers are represented in the data. For example, I might see CWOP-7 and CWOP-3, but other numbers are missing. That does kind of lead me to believe that maybe some servers are accepting my posts, but not in turn relaying them correctly to the APRS network. I would imagine that anyone putting their data on the net via inet APRS gateways would be having the same snaggle tooth data unless they are accessing one known good server. I did edit my .conf to only access the ei3rcw node. Let's see what happens. Worst case I can set up a radio packet node. I do have a radio and TNC, but I am using it for a PBBS. Thank you, Chris KQ6UP -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "weewx-user" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/weewx-user/1c9c6cc0-d65d-7c9e-018f-c81b44aebc73%40gmail.com.
0x163643459E5CF84C.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
