That's fine. I can fix what's needed for me where upstream has ceased working on it. Until then I can suggest adding syslog filters on their system. I'm not sure there are still repos where I can commit, tho.
However, with all due respect, you don't maintain WeeWx for devs but for the general audience so the "whiney" comment is a bit out of the line, I think. Users will "whine" while not contributing a single line. And that's perfectly fine. Even if "whining" don't lead to anywhere. I can do all the fixes I need without barking around on these forums but I think if this has a viable user side solution for other folks with a similar problem, we can all benefit from seeing the solution here. I'm maintaining a driver now that also will get the v4 treatment. And that's also perfectly OK, since that's my job. On Thursday, May 21, 2020 at 2:33:04 PM UTC+2, Tom Keffer wrote: > > For the record, Gary is one of the core developers. > > For a variety of reasons, one of the goals of V4 was to not depend on > syslog. Yes, you've found a regression, but not a very major one. It can't > be fixed without breaking that goal. > > We have tried hard to get 3rd parties to "catch up", to the point of > submitting PRs for them. I personally have submitted a dozen or so. > > ...if I ever get to thoroughly know the insights of the logging mechanisms >> inside core WeeWx code, I will happily contribute a fix. However, until >> then, please don't sound like that's the only way to fix regressions. > > > I'd also say, "No whining if you don't contribute." > > -tk > > > > > On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 2:06 AM kobuki <nls...@gmail.com <javascript:>> > wrote: > >> Certainly, if I ever get to thoroughly know the insights of the logging >> mechanisms inside core WeeWx code, I will happily contribute a fix. >> However, until then, please don't sound like that's the only way to fix >> regressions. That aside, what I'd like to hear is some opinion or statement >> from core devs if they consider it a regression at all, or it was expected >> from the get go with all the breaking changes for 3rd party devs to catch >> up. I will respect their stance in that case and let it go. >> >> On Thursday, May 21, 2020 at 10:56:03 AM UTC+2, gjr80 wrote: >>> >>> Yes, you maybe right. As Tom says, PRs are always welcome. >>> >>> Gary >>> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "weewx-user" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to weewx...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>. >> To view this discussion on the web visit >> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/weewx-user/9515f5d6-35c6-4806-b0a6-6f86a58b64c6%40googlegroups.com >> >> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/weewx-user/9515f5d6-35c6-4806-b0a6-6f86a58b64c6%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> >> . >> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "weewx-user" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to weewx-user+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/weewx-user/e749e174-e83d-4125-8e48-95e177260850%40googlegroups.com.
