gjr80 <[email protected]> writes: > You will notice the highlight on the word radiation (but not the word > field) in my original post, this was in reference to the WeeWX field named > radiation, not to something known as 'field radiation'.
Sorry, reading in plain text so I did not actually notice that :-) > I don't disagree but irrespective the GW1000 API has no ability to return > data that is suitable to be placed in the WeeWX field called radiation. If Sure, didn't mean to come across as questioning that as all. > the user wishes to derive values to place in any WeeWX fields that of > course is their call and whilst WeeWX has the machinery to do such things > it is left as an exercise for the user. In the glorious future, there might be a stdconvert routine to create radiation from illuminace, perhaps enabled with a config variable becusae 1) not everybody wants it and 2) it's not really sound. I meant to be in agreement and offer pointers to further info for people looking into this. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "weewx-user" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/weewx-user/rmih7tvtbcx.fsf%40s1.lexort.com.
