John Thanks for the quick reply. So far weewx-airlink works great. Thats what I figured that needs to be done. What would be better; A separate database or keep extending the schema. I'm leaning towards a database approach.
Thanks On Sunday, October 18, 2020 at 10:05:28 AM UTC-4, John Kline wrote: > > weewx-airlink uses newly added columns for air quality in WeeWX’s extended > schema. There is no provision for storing readings from multiple sensors. > That would require extending the schema, creating a separate database or > repurposing unused columns in the schema. I’m not keen on any of those. > > On Oct 18, 2020, at 6:21 AM, rich T <[email protected] <javascript:>> > wrote: > > > How would you differentiate the sensor data in the database if you have > two or more Air Monitoring sensors? > > Thanks > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "weewx-user" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected] <javascript:>. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/weewx-user/9fcd8612-ed3a-428d-b665-c37028bacf4ao%40googlegroups.com > > <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/weewx-user/9fcd8612-ed3a-428d-b665-c37028bacf4ao%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> > . > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "weewx-user" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/weewx-user/40c41689-b481-4ee6-9255-b103e6c970efo%40googlegroups.com.
