>> - https://github.com/bellrichm/WeeWX-MQTTSubscribe
>That takes data from mqtt and treats it like a sensor in weewx.
Okay, so it's rather this one I need.
>weewx has a concept of driver and service. I think you will have to
>pehaps modify the WMR200 driver to behave as if temp is not there, and
>run mqttsubscribe as a service to inject temperature from your Wemo.
Yes that's the idea. Still use WMR200 driver, but add mqttsubscribe as a
service.
The documentation for MQTTSubscribe gives a short example for the service
(see below). I understand where the Engine part goes. But I am not sure
what "topic1" is ?
[MQTTSubscribeService]
host = localhost
payload_type = json
[[topics]]
[[[topic1]]]
[[[topic2]]]
[Engine]
[[Services]] data_services = user.MQTTSubscribe.MQTTSubscribeService
On Sunday, November 8, 2020 at 5:53:55 PM UTC+1 Greg Troxel wrote:
>
> Invisible Man <[email protected]> writes:
>
> > The external temperature of my WMR200 is failing, and it's apparently
> > difficult to find a replacement. So, I'm using a temperature sensor I
> did
> > myself (based on a Wemo + DS18B20 sensor) which sends the temperature to
> a
> > MQTT broker (a Raspberry Pi).
> >
> > I've seen at least 2 different projects to use MQTT with Weewx :
> >
> > - https://github.com/morrowwm/weewxMQTT
>
> That publishes data from weewx to mqtt.
>
> > - https://github.com/bellrichm/WeeWX-MQTTSubscribe
>
> That takes data from mqtt and treats it like a sensor in weewx.
>
> > Is there a preferred way? Also, I am going to have some data coming from
> > WMR200 (rain, wind...), and some other coming from MQTT (temperature). I
> > don't think weewx supports several drivers, does it ? So it means I'll
> keep
> > using wmr200 driver and use something to insert only temperature from
> MQTT.
>
> weewx has a concept of driver and service. I think you will have to
> pehaps modify the WMR200 driver to behave as if temp is not there, and
> run mqttsubscribe as a service to inject temperature from your Wemo.
>
> This is from a big picture viewpoint not so strange, but it is strange
> in that outside temperature is arguably the primary reading from a
> station, so not having that is very odd. Therefore I would not be
> surprised to find a baked-in assumption about that which needs to be
> overridden.
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"weewx-user" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/weewx-user/c9508937-b5f0-4c3f-ae15-d59948b15525n%40googlegroups.com.
