Thank you from me aswell. I received my PWS yesterday, used the GW1000 
driver and was about to ask the same question, then I found this.

I have one more question about pressure mapping.
I noticed the driver maps "absbarometer" to "pressure" but the 
"relbarometer" to "relbarometer" aswell, which as far as I know is not used 
by default in Weewx.
In the WeeWX wiki I found that it uses "pressure", "altimeter", and 
"barometer".

Did you make these mappings so that you let the WeeWX recalculate the other 
parameters automatically from the "absbarometer"? This gives a different 
result then I have in WS View app (I guess the app only uses offset based 
on altitude, but weewx actually uses humidity and temperature aswell), now 
the problem is that the sea-level pressure is reported higher then other 
stations around me (including METAR), to correct this should I offset the 
absolute pressure in the WS View app? Or maybe used the corrections in 
weewx?
I have problem with sending data PWSWeather, not sure what parameter for 
pressure it sends, but when I open the station on their website, open 
Observations, there is no reported pressure, then in the dashboard I see 
some pressure, but it is even higher than the one reported by WeeWX.

Thank you

On Thursday, December 17, 2020 at 11:31:35 AM UTC+1 [email protected] 
wrote:

> Thanks, Gary
> that was enlightening  😎 - and apart from planning to explain the details 
> more in the wiki (which is highly appreciated), 
> I suggest to include the above entries to the [[Corrections]] stanza also 
> in the readme file that comes with GW1000 API driver 
> and also include them - unless already done (I cannot tell as I did the 
> migration to the API driver manually) - in the install process which 
> updates the weewx.conf file.
> Great to have knowledgeable people to explain and help !
>
> On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 8:34 AM gjr80 <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> The short answer is that radiation (aka solar insulation) or an 
>> equivalent is not available via the GW1000 API so the GW1000 driver does 
>> not emit it. The reason you see it on Ecowitt pages and WU is that the 
>> GW1000 takes what the GW1000 API refers to as 'light' in lux and 
>> approximates solar insolation by dividing by 126.7. The GW1000 then uploads 
>> this derived value to Ecowitt and WU (and to anywhere else the GW1000 is 
>> configured to upload). A similar result can be achieved with WeeWX by 
>> having the WeeWX StdCalculate service calculate WeeWX field radiation. 
>> This is done by adding an entry for radiation under [StdCalculate] 
>> [[Corrections]] in weewx.conf:
>>
>> [StdCalibrate]
>>      ....
>>     [[Corrections]]
>>         ....
>>         radiation = luminosity/126.7 if luminosity is not None else None 
>>
>> The reason the interceptor driver picked up radiation is that the 
>> interceptor driver intercepts the the same data the GW1000 uploads to 
>> Ecowitt or WU, so the interceptor driver sees the radiation field that 
>> was calculated by the GW1000. WeeWX drivers do not calculate/derive 
>> observations; rather they decode/unit translate data provided buy the 
>> station/sensors only. Calculation of derived observations is taken care of 
>> by other WeeWX services, typically the StdCalculate service.
>>
>> I can't speak for what Cumulus does but I know Cumulus obtains the exact 
>> same data from the API that the GW1000 driver does. Cumulus must be set to 
>> automatically derive solar insolation from luminosity.
>>
>> As further background, the GW1000 API emits three 'radiation' related 
>> observations; what the API refers to as 'light' in lux, 'UV' in 
>> microwatts/square metre and 'UVI' an index from 0-15. Of these 
>> observations 'light' corresponds to the WeeWX extended schema field 
>> luminosity and 'UVI' corresponds to WeeWX field UV. Consequently, (and 
>> by default) these observations are mapped to the equivalent WeeWX field. 
>> There is no equivalent to the GW1000 API field 'UV' so the GW1000 driver 
>> passes this field through as uvradiation (uvradiation was chosen to 
>> distinguish it from WeeWX field UV). Note that uvradiation is not 
>> equivalent to WeeWX field radiation.
>>
>> I am in the process of producing a wiki page for the driver repo to 
>> explain this.
>>
>> Gary
>> On Thursday, 17 December 2020 at 09:41:03 UTC+10 [email protected] 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I was running Weewx with the GW1000 interceptor and everything ran 
>>> smoothly. After downloading and installing the GW1000 API driver v. 
>>> 0.1.012b and meticulously following the readme instructions, I got the 
>>> system running - with ONE issue - the solar radiation data had disappeared 
>>> and would no longer be displayed. 
>>>
>>> (they are there and sent to Ecowitt.net, WU etc. and are captured by 
>>> CumulusMX and Meteobridge => it's not a GW1000 console issue, it's 
>>> obviously a weewx (configuration ?) issue. I have 4 GW1000 type consoles 
>>> and switched between them to make sure it's not due to the console [with 
>>> weewxd]. 
>>>
>>> Since midnight the solar radiation picture/graph has completely 
>>> disappeared.
>>> So I'm wondering what went wrong here ...
>>> Anyone can advise ?
>>> attached the syslog of the driver switch time window and some debug=1 
>>> output at the end, the weewx.conf, a screencopy of the missing or mutilated 
>>> graph and the output of weexd as screencopy and text.
>>>
>> -- 
>>
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "weewx-user" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to [email protected].
>>
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/weewx-user/d085a7f5-f83a-445b-82dc-6cd826f25456n%40googlegroups.com
>>  
>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/weewx-user/d085a7f5-f83a-445b-82dc-6cd826f25456n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>> .
>>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"weewx-user" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/weewx-user/42b9d5e0-0f57-4685-aece-440ecf183ec4n%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to