Hi Rich,

thanks for the reply. Now I can see that it is working, but my Skin would 
not be generated. So I search another error.

Regards
Christian

[email protected] schrieb am Freitag, 5. März 2021 um 16:18:42 UTC+1:

> Thinking more, I am pretty sure the alpha code won’t work for you. 
> - rich
>
> On Friday, 5 March 2021 at 09:58:38 UTC-5 [email protected] wrote:
>
>> Christian,
>> I’d recommend adding ‘append_units_label = False’ on the publish side. 
>> This will stop the appending of units to the label and you won’t have to 
>> rename them on the subscribing side.
>>
>> I’d expect the subscribing config to look something like this.
>>
>> [MQTTSubscribeDriver]
>>     driver = user.MQTTSubscribe
>>
>>     host = 
>>     
>>     [[message_callback]]
>>         type = json
>>     
>>     [[topics]]
>>         unit_system = METRIC
>>         [[[weather/loop]]]
>>
>> If you post the log from startup through one archive period, I could dig 
>> deeper.
>>
>> Important note, with the set up above, I believe you are publishing 
>> archive records. These are received and put into loop packets by 
>> MQTTSubscribe. WeeWX would then create archive records out of them. I think 
>> this should all work, but there might be some timing issues. The log would 
>> show what is going on.
>> I do have alpha/experimental code that would receive the MQTT payload and 
>> process it as an archive record. It would very much be “use at your own 
>> risk”.
>> - rich
>>
>> On Friday, 5 March 2021 at 09:05:50 UTC-5 [email protected] wrote:
>>
>>> ok, i installed the receiver Weewx new from scratch. No it seems to work 
>>> without errors.
>>> I See in the (debugLevel 2) the incoming MQTTValues. But they don't 
>>> where displayed in the screen. It seems, there is one point missing.
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> Christian 
>>>
>>> [email protected] schrieb am Freitag, 5. März 2021 um 14:32:15 UTC+1:
>>>
>>>> a driver creates the original packet with a timestamp, a service 
>>>> changes (usually adds to) the existing packet.
>>>> some modules, like gw1000, can be configured to be in either mode (i.e. 
>>>> originate packets, or augment existing packets produced by some other 
>>>> driver). i do this, with vantage as driver and gw1000 in service mode
>>>>
>>>> On 5 Mar 2021, at 10:59 pm, Christian Radermacher <
>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> In which case I user Service, in which case I use driver?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"weewx-user" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/weewx-user/d3804839-a5ef-4425-8b43-f82520d75a9cn%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to