@JRJ: So, you're saying that WeeWX stopped generating reports but data 
still was recorded in the database, correct?
If yes, it seems unlikely that it's a driver issue and more on the weewx 
engine's side.

[email protected] schrieb am Mittwoch, 9. Juni 2021 um 20:22:01 UTC+2:

> @chris:  yes, indeed, the issue on my system was that weewx stopped 
> producing reports (and also there were no reporting-related messages in the 
> log.  I do am now running with debug set to 1 in the config.
>
> JRJ
>
> On Wednesday, June 9, 2021 at 12:09:08 PM UTC-5 [email protected] wrote:
>
>> JRJ:
>>
>> Are you saying that weewx stopped generating reports? My weewx stopped 
>> generating reports, with no error messages, at 4:00 AM. Restarting service 
>> weewx did not fix it. Rebooting my raspberry pi DID fix it. So, I added a 
>> crontab entry to reboot my raspberry pi each morning:
>> 5 4 * * * /sbin/shutdown -r now
>>
>> So far, it has not happened again. I'm using a WMII, with serial port 
>> connection, using Python3 and the latest version of the driver from 
>> JayJaeger
>>
>> Chris Shaker
>>
>> On Wednesday, June 9, 2021 at 5:46:52 AM UTC-7 [email protected] wrote:
>>
>>> @michael:  It should not be related to the SCP upload, which continues 
>>> even after weewx has gone "night night".  It is running from a cron, not 
>>> under weewx.  It merely copies the generated HTML/graphics up to another 
>>> machine.  It runs  every 17  minutes.  If it were, say, locking up a file 
>>> and causing a report to fail there ought to be a message from Python about 
>>> that, and there are no such messages.  This same SCP was running with weewx 
>>> version 3 for many months without issues - originally every 15 minutes, I 
>>> changed it from 15 to 17 yesterday to put it out of sync from the report 
>>> generation a bit it after the second failure, just in case.  
>>>
>>> [It did occur to me to add a little mod akin to the RSYNC present in 
>>> weewx itself, or to cut over to using  then RSYNC under weewx after the 
>>> rest of this gets straightened out.]
>>>
>>> I also verified that all of the files and directories are owned by and 
>>> have the same group as the weewx process, and they are, so it should not be 
>>> an issue of file permissions during report generation, either.
>>>
>>> Regarding the dev release driver, sure, I'll give that a try, and turn 
>>> on more logging later today.
>>>
>>> JRJ
>>>
>>> On Wednesday, June 9, 2021 at 1:40:52 AM UTC-5 [email protected] 
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Nah, the logging level change doesn't matter, I've published a dev 
>>>> release a few days ago making exactly that change.
>>>>
>>>> I'd suggest you to try the new driver version anyway since I also made 
>>>> some changes regarding the HTTP interaction with the WLL. You should also 
>>>> enable debug logging so we get a more exhaustive look into what's going on.
>>>>
>>>> My suspicion is that something's wrong with the report generation or 
>>>> the SCP upload. Was the last iteration of the report actually uploaded 
>>>> correctly?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> vince schrieb am Mittwoch, 9. Juni 2021 um 06:10:01 UTC+2:
>>>>
>>>>> On Tuesday, June 8, 2021 at 12:43:44 PM UTC-7 [email protected] wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> (Note: I  did "tweaked" the WLL driver code to suppress the "Emitting 
>>>>>> poll/(broadcast) messages by changing those two log calls to 
>>>>>> "log.debug").  
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I'd suggest running the unaltered driver and especially in this case 
>>>>> so you get the maximum logging so the author can help you.
>>>>>
>>>>> If you start changing his code, eventually it'll be "you changed it, 
>>>>> you own the results good or bad" when he can't recreate the issue because 
>>>>> your code has diverged from the authoritative version.
>>>>>
>>>>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"weewx-user" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/weewx-user/7b992998-efb5-49fa-8086-1b342af62352n%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to