Parameters like that can predict that fog is likely, but to actually identify 
fog you need to observe that the visibility is less than 1 km. (Visibility 
between 1 and 5 km is haze or mist.) The automated weather observation systems 
commonly installed at airports and other locations include a visibility sensor 
that measures how much light is scattered in a small volume of air. The 
principle is pretty simple but I haven’t seen any low-cost consumer version. 

  -Les


> On Sep 3, 2021, at 6:06 AM, František Slimařík <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> just like I mentioned in the start, it will not be so easy to predict fog. In 
> case of my location I had following conditions this morning between 5-6AM and 
> no fog was visible. Just condensation on the cars etc.
> 
> Temperature between 6-7°C
> Humidity 97%
> no wind
> no solar radiation
> also difference between temperature and dew point was just 0,4°C
> 
> Dne pátek 3. září 2021 v 13:51:16 UTC+2 uživatel mihec napsal:
>> I'm using Weather Display with one of my stations and use the built in 
>> function to set the fog/haze conditions. It works very good.
>> Fog conditions:
>> * T < 10°C
>> * 95% >= humidity
>> * low wind or no wind
>> * solar radiation low
>> 
>> Haze:
>> * T < 13°C
>> * 94% >= humidity
>> * low wind, low solar
>> 
>> I might have slightly adapted humidity threshold, I don't remember.
>> 
>> 
>> sreda, 01. september 2021 ob 00:29:22 UTC+2 je oseba [email protected] 
>> napisala:
>>> In general, the possibility of fog developing is when the dewpoint spread 
>>> is less then  5 degrees F.
>>> 
>>>> On Tuesday, August 31, 2021 at 6:02:58 PM UTC-4 [email protected] wrote:
>>>> * On 2021 31 Aug 14:35 -0500, František Slimařík wrote: 
>>>> > 
>>>> > Hi all, 
>>>> > 
>>>> > I got question for hardcore meteorologists here. Is it possible to 
>>>> > detect 
>>>> > fog based on classic meassured values like temperature, humidity, 
>>>> > preasure, 
>>>> > etc? 
>>>> > Logically I would say fog appears when dew point equals current 
>>>> > temeperature but I guess it will not be so easy. Fogs didn't appear here 
>>>> > this year in my locality so I am waiting for autumn to start with 
>>>> > observations. 
>>>> 
>>>> I'm certainly no meteorologist! 
>>>> 
>>>> It seems we've had more foggy mornings this summer than in years past. 
>>>> Humidity has certainly been high with only a handful of stretches with 
>>>> more than a day below 50% relative humidity. 
>>>> 
>>>> Many times it seems as though warm air over cooler moist ground is 
>>>> necessary for its formation. I don't think this is a temperature 
>>>> inversion, as such, but they also seem to sometimes be quite localized 
>>>> and are related to some interesting effects. 
>>>> 
>>>> I along with other radio amateurs and possibly Greg find the effects of 
>>>> these weather phenomena on VHF and UHF radio propagation interesting. 
>>>> 
>>>> - Nate 
>>>> 
>>>> -- 
>>>> "The optimist proclaims that we live in the best of all 
>>>> possible worlds. The pessimist fears this is true." 
>>>> Web: https://www.n0nb.us 
>>>> Projects: https://github.com/N0NB 
>>>> GPG fingerprint: 82D6 4F6B 0E67 CD41 F689 BBA6 FB2C 5130 D55A 8819 
>>>> 
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "weewx-user" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to [email protected].
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/weewx-user/909cb30b-7281-4d27-99eb-59b0f3dfb41dn%40googlegroups.com.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"weewx-user" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/weewx-user/9F5E54C4-1CE2-434C-AAC0-95474D4E9A34%402pi.org.

Reply via email to