I just did a screen copy from a terminal that I have going with ssh
On Thursday, March 23, 2023 at 10:34:01 AM UTC+11 gjr80 wrote: > Each line in the --test-driver output appears to be truncated: > > Gary > On Thursday, 23 March 2023 at 09:30:42 UTC+10 [email protected] wrote: > >> I included how I ran the command in the second part just incase its >> something I am doing >> >> Ok here is the first part >> >> test driver >> >> Using configuration file /etc/weewx/weewx.conf >> debug level is '1' >> >> IP address obtained from station config >> Port number obtained from station config >> Battery state filtering ('False') using the default >> >> Interrogating GW2000 at 192.168.1.110:45000 >> >> 2023-03-22 23:19:02 UTC (1679527142): 'dateTime': '1679527142', >> 'daymaxwind': '4.1', ' >> '64', 'extraTemp1': '20.8', 'inHumidity': '66', 'inTemp': '20.6', >> 'lightning_distance' >> ning_last_det_time': '1679527051', 'lightning_strike_count': 'None', >> 'lightningcount': >> ity': '3210.0', 'outHumidity': '96', 'outTemp': '15.1', 'p_dayRain': >> '2.6', 'p_monthRa >> _rain': 'None', 'p_rainRate': '15.0', 'p_stormRain': '5.1', 'p_weekRain': >> '5.6', 'p_ye >> , 'pressure': '944.3', 'relbarometer': '944.3', 'soilMoist1': '44', >> 'soilMoist2': '22' >> : '68', 'usUnits': '17', 'UV': '0', 'uvradiation': '0.0', >> 'wh31_ch1_batt': '0', 'wh31_ >> 'wh51_ch1_batt': '1.6', 'wh51_ch1_sig': '4', 'wh51_ch2_batt': '1.6', >> 'wh51_ch2_sig': >> _batt': '1.5', 'wh51_ch7_sig': '4', 'wh57_batt': '5', 'wh57_sig': '4', >> 'windDir': '240 >> '1.7', 'windSpeed': '0.9', 'ws90_batt': '3.2', 'ws90_sig': '4' >> 2023-03-22 23:19:22 UTC (1679527162): 'dateTime': '1679527162', >> 'daymaxwind': '4.1', ' >> '64', 'extraTemp1': '20.8', 'inHumidity': '66', 'inTemp': '20.6', >> 'lightning_distance' >> ning_last_det_time': '1679527051', 'lightning_strike_count': '0', >> 'lightningcount': '5 >> ': '3080.0', 'outHumidity': '96', 'outTemp': '15.0', 'p_dayRain': '2.6', >> 'p_monthRain' >> in': '0.0', 'p_rainRate': '15.0', 'p_stormRain': '5.1', 'p_weekRain': >> '5.6', 'p_yearRa >> ressure': '944.3', 'relbarometer': '944.3', 'soilMoist1': '44', >> 'soilMoist2': '22', 's >> 8', 'usUnits': '17', 'UV': '0', 'uvradiation': '0.0', 'wh31_ch1_batt': >> '0', 'wh31_ch1_ >> 51_ch1_batt': '1.6', 'wh51_ch1_sig': '4', 'wh51_ch2_batt': '1.6', >> 'wh51_ch2_sig': '4', >> t': '1.5', 'wh51_ch7_sig': '4', 'wh57_batt': '5', 'wh57_sig': '4', >> 'windDir': '273', ' >> 3', 'windSpeed': '1.0', 'ws90_batt': '3.2', 'ws90_sig': '4' >> >> >> second part root@mail:/home# PYTHONPATH=/usr/share/weewx python3 -m >> user.gw1000 --live-data >> Using configuration file /etc/weewx/weewx.conf >> debug level is '1' >> >> IP address obtained from station config >> Port number obtained from station config >> Battery state filtering ('False') using the default >> >> Interrogating GW2000 at 192.168.1.110:45000 >> >> Displaying data using the WeeWX METRIC unit group. >> >> GW2000 live sensor data (2023-03-22 23:27:59 UTC (1679527679)): >> 'absbarometer': '944.500000', 'annual_reset': '0.000000', 'day_reset': >> '0.000000', 'daymaxwind': '14.760000', 'gain0': '1.000000', 'gain1': >> '1.000000', 'gain2': '1.000000', 'gain3': '1.000000', 'gain4': '1.000000', >> 'gain5': '1.000000', 'gain6': '1.000000', 'gain7': '1.000000', 'gain8': >> '1.000000', 'gain9': '1.000000', 'gustspeed': '5.040000', 'humid1': >> '64.000000', 'inhumid': '65.000000', 'intemp': '20.700000', 'light': >> '2800.000000', 'lightningcount': '10.000000', 'lightningdettime': >> '22-Mar-2023 23:27', 'lightningdist': '12.000000', 'outhumid': '98.000000', >> 'outtemp': '14.500000', 'p_rainday': '0.440000', 'p_rainevent': '0.690000', >> 'p_rainmonth': '1.010000', 'p_rainrate': '1.260000', 'p_rainweek': >> '0.740000', 'p_rainyear': '1.010000', 'rain_source': '2.000000', >> 'relbarometer': '944.500000', 'soilmoist1': '44.000000', 'soilmoist2': >> '24.000000', 'soilmoist7': '73.000000', 'temp1': '20.800000', 'uv': >> '0.000000', 'uvi': '0.000000', 'week_reset': '0.000000', 'wh31_ch1_batt': >> '0.000000', 'wh31_ch1_sig': '4.000000', 'wh51_ch1_batt': '1.60', >> 'wh51_ch1_sig': '4.000000', 'wh51_ch2_batt': '1.60', 'wh51_ch2_sig': >> '4.000000', 'wh51_ch7_batt': '1.50', 'wh51_ch7_sig': '4.000000', >> 'wh57_batt': '5.000000', 'wh57_sig': '4.000000', 'winddir': '279.000000', >> 'windspeed': '2.160000', 'ws90_batt': '3.20', 'ws90_sig': '4.000000' >> On Thursday, March 23, 2023 at 10:07:09 AM UTC+11 gjr80 wrote: >> >>> There are a couple of checks you can do to confirm the gateway device is >>> working and WeeWX is receiving the expected data. The first check is to run >>> the driver directly with the --live-data command line option. This will >>> display the data received by the gateway device before the data is mapped >>> to any WeeWX field. This proves the gateway device is correctly talking to >>> the sensors. The second check is to again run the driver directly but this >>> time with the --test-driver command line option. This will result in >>> the driver emitting loop packets to the console. This again proves the >>> gateway device is talking to the sensors, but also proves the mapping of >>> gateway device data to WeeWX fields. If you like, it shows what data the >>> driver will send to WeeWX. The final check is to run WeeWX directly. This >>> check proves the sensors are communicating with the gateway device, the >>> driver is mapping the gateway device data to WeeWX fields and that WeeWX is >>> receiving the loop packet data from the gateway device driver. When running >>> WeeWX directly you should see rainfall data appearing in WeeWX rain related >>> fields, eg rain and rainRate. If this is not the case then it is >>> unlikely that any WeeWX generated outputs (reports, uploads etc) will >>> contain rain related data. >>> >>> Running the latter two of above checks are covered in the Gateway >>> driver readme >>> <https://github.com/gjr80/weewx-gw1000/blob/master/README.md#installation-as-a-weewx-driver>. >>> >>> Running the driver directly with the --live-data command line option is >>> not covered in the readme, but it is identical to running the driver >>> directly with the --test-driver command line option you just need to >>> substitute the --live-data command line option. You can also use the >>> --help command line option when running the driver directly to display >>> details of each available command line option. >>> >>> Gary >>> >>> On Thursday, 23 March 2023 at 05:40:27 UTC+10 [email protected] wrote: >>> >>>> Hey again Garry. I am trying to work out if this is a weewx or >>>> weather34 issue. I can see as mentioned above the rain (or what I believe >>>> is the rain figures) in the loop but when I went to my cwop page after I >>>> went home it shows no rain either and that gets fed from Weewx. The >>>> wunderground page that gets fed directly from the GW2000 shows the rain. >>>> >>>> I am happy to post any logs etc if that helps or look at anything if >>>> you can point me in that direction. >>>> >>>> On Wednesday, March 22, 2023 at 12:17:58 PM UTC+11 Peter Peter wrote: >>>> >>>>> Thanks Gary. I was trying to beat you back here but alas I didnt. I >>>>> did a search on the gw2000 and found some posts and like you suggested >>>>> here >>>>> ran Weewx directly and can see both the rain in the loop and rec so that >>>>> parts seems ok. I will do a bit more research and see what I can find. I >>>>> have been trying the Weather34 skin/web stuff and thats how I noticed it >>>>> and then went and looked at other stuff. It gives me something to tinker >>>>> with >>>>> >>>>> On Wednesday, March 22, 2023 at 11:47:10 AM UTC+11 gjr80 wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On Wednesday, 22 March 2023 at 10:05:31 UTC+10 [email protected] >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Hey all. >>>>>> >>>>>> I have been running Weewx together with my Ecowitt and using the >>>>>> GW1000 setup. My base unit is actually a GW2000C_V2.2.3C >>>>>> >>>>>> When I initially set it up I ran it in simulator mode and all seemed >>>>>> ok >>>>>> >>>>>> I have been waiting for rain and we have some today but it appears >>>>>> Weewx isnt picking up the rain info. The last update of the rain data in >>>>>> relation the the graphics was over a week ago and thats when I changed >>>>>> from >>>>>> Simulator to real. At that stage I deleted the database and let it start. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> What sensor is connected to your GW2000 and reporting rain? I'm >>>>>> guessing it is a WS90? The GW2000 (and other Ecowitt gateway devices) >>>>>> simultaneously support traditional tipping type rain gauges (eg WH40) as >>>>>> well as piezo based WS90. A default install of the Ecowitt Gateway >>>>>> driver >>>>>> will map tipping rain gauge data through to WeeWX. If using a piezo >>>>>> based >>>>>> sensor (eg WS90) then the piezo rain data is passed through to WeeWX, >>>>>> but >>>>>> it must be manually mapped to suitable WeeWX fields. If you do indeed >>>>>> have >>>>>> a WS90 (and no other rain gauge) try adding a >>>>>> [[field_map_extensions]] stanza to [GW1000] in weewx.conf as follows: >>>>>> >>>>>> [GW1000] >>>>>> .... >>>>>> [[field_map_extensions]] >>>>>> rain = p_rain >>>>>> stormRain = p_rainevent >>>>>> rainRate = p_rainrate >>>>>> dayRain = p_rainday >>>>>> weekRain = p_rainweek >>>>>> monthRain = p_rainmonth >>>>>> yearRain = p_rainyear >>>>>> >>>>>> Stop WeeWX if it is running and try running WeeWX directly >>>>>> <http://weewx.com/docs/usersguide.htm#Running_directly>, you should >>>>>> see rainfall data appearing in the usual WeeWX rain fields. If you do >>>>>> indeed see rainfall data then stop WeeWX and restart it as a daemon. >>>>>> >>>>>> If you don't have a WS90 or have multiple rain gauges then some >>>>>> additional changes will be required. If this is the case, or the above >>>>>> does >>>>>> not work, post back here. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> The only thing I notice in the debug syslog entry that may be related >>>>>> is >>>>>> DEBUG user.gw1000: Unknown field address '7B' detected. Remaining >>>>>> data '00' ignored. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> You can safely ignore this; the GW2000 firmware includes an >>>>>> additional field that was not identified in the Ecowitt Gateway API >>>>>> documentation on which the v0.5.0b5 Ecwoitt Gateway driver is based. >>>>>> Consequently v0.5.0b5 ignores, but debug logs, the unknown field. >>>>>> Ecowitt >>>>>> has since documented this unknown field as indicating whether or not >>>>>> radiation compensation is applied when reporting outside temperature for >>>>>> WH65/WH69/WS80/WS90 devices. >>>>>> >>>>>> Gary >>>>>> >>>>> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "weewx-user" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/weewx-user/15883643-0a7a-4da2-86cd-64bf7bdf2af2n%40googlegroups.com.
