Upgrade from 4.10 on Debian was no problem. The only thing to mention is the docs say to do apt install and I did it as apt update.
On Monday, January 15, 2024 at 10:15:34 AM UTC-8 matthew wall wrote: > On Sunday, January 14, 2024 at 8:51:09 PM UTC-5 vince wrote: > > Matthew - the issue now on f39 is 'your' old key from keys.html. Tom's > updated key imports ok. > > > short version: we need to use 4096 bits and SHA256 > > for the record (and the benefit of future me), the latest fedora rejects > tom's original key because it is SHA1, but it rejects my original key > because it is a 1024-bit asymmetric that was created in 2014. this will > probably be an issue on suse, since we sign the rpms for both redhat and > suse. it is easier to fix for debian, since we sign the repository index > for apt, not individual .deb files. we'll re-sign everything (again). > > for those of you who need to update signatures and things you have signed, > redhat has some details: > > https://www.redhat.com/en/blog/updating-gpg-keys-for-fedora-and-rhel > > and this NIST 2019 publication explains why it is necessary: > > > https://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/SpecialPublications/NIST.SP.800-131Ar2.pdf > > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "weewx-user" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/weewx-user/c970aab7-1ee3-45c0-8596-9a15f93b10c4n%40googlegroups.com.
