Just caught a LOOP package:

LOOP:   2025-08-21 20:17:16 CEST (1755800236)
'p_rain': '0.10000000000002274',

Which looks correct. The value written to the database in this interval: 
0.00344827586206975



Werner Krenn schrieb am Donnerstag, 21. August 2025 um 20:10:43 UTC+2:

> Ok, I use hail instead of p_rain and with hail the value has to be 
> multiplied by a factor of 25.4 to get a correct display,
> but only for the graphs,  the value is always correct. 
>
>         [[[dayrainbar]]]
>             yscale = None, None, 0.02
>             plot_type = bar
>             y_label = "mm"
>             [[[[rain]]]]
>                 aggregate_type = sum
>                 aggregate_interval = 600
>                 label = Rain WH40 (10min)
>             [[[[hail]]]]
>                 data_type = hail * 25.4
>                 aggregate_type = sum
>                 aggregate_interval = 600
>                 label = Rain Piezo (10min)
>             [[[[ET]]]]
>                 color = "#edba21"
>                 aggregate_type = sum
>                 aggregate_interval = 600
>                 label = ET (10min)
>
> steepleian schrieb am Donnerstag, 21. August 2025 um 16:46:03 UTC+2:
>
>> I am actually working on a complete re-write which will also incorporate 
>> live data output in a json file. It will also have the option of 
>> subscribing to to MQTT topic published directly from the gateway device 
>> using the new Ecowitt in built MQTT weather service.
>> https://claydonsweather.org.uk
>>
>> On 21 Aug 2025, at 15:33, '[email protected]' via weewx-user <
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> No, the WS90 itself has a resolution of 0.1mm, but I get increments < 
>> 0.01mm in the database, which shouldn't be possible. It's with with 
>> Werner's v0.2.2. When receiving LOO data emitted through weewx_mqtt, I 
>> receiver the correct 0.1mm increments. 
>>
>>
>>
>> steepleian schrieb am Donnerstag, 21. August 2025 um 16:17:16 UTC+2:
>>
>>> Michael,
>>> Are you describing the fact there are an insufficient number of decimal 
>>> places to record small quantities of rain?
>>> Ian
>>>
>>> https://claydonsweather.org.uk
>>>
>>> On 21 Aug 2025, at 14:07, '[email protected]' via weewx-user <
>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>> I still have an Issue with storing p_rain values in the database. In 
>>> the database (metricwx) are values well below 1/10mm, while from the Loop 
>>> p_rain values of x/10mm are reported.
>>>
>>>
>>> Currently (and the next hours) it is raining, the live chart rises in 
>>> x/10mm steps, when the values are loaded from the db after a refresh, 
>>> p_rain ist much lower than rain from the traditional gauge.
>>> https://www.kainzbauer.net/weather/Test/Rif/ws90/index.html
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> [email protected] schrieb am Samstag, 2. August 2025 um 20:31:59 
>>> UTC+2:
>>>
>>>> OK, I've set 
>>>> [StdWXCalculate]
>>>>     [[Calculations]]
>>>>         rainRate = software
>>>>
>>>> Setting it to
>>>>
>>>> [StdWXCalculate]
>>>>     [[Calculations]]
>>>>         rainRate = prefer_hardware
>>>>
>>>> And it's there. The question now is, how is the hardware calculating it 
>>>> compared to weewx? The WS28xx did it on a hourly basis, weewx afaik on a 
>>>> 15min basis.
>>>> [email protected] schrieb am Samstag, 2. August 2025 um 17:56:33 
>>>> UTC+2:
>>>>
>>>>> Indeed. A quick test shows the value are now being backfilled. 
>>>>> But for "rain" the "rainRate" doesn't seem to be calculated correctly, 
>>>>> or at all: it is zero. Interestingly "p_rainRate" is calculated correctly 
>>>>> when backfilled. But to be honest: I don't know if the issue is only when 
>>>>> being backfilled, I'll check that real quick. It's raining cats and dogs, 
>>>>> so it won't take too long :D
>>>>>
>>>>> Werner Krenn schrieb am Samstag, 2. August 2025 um 17:02:55 UTC+2:
>>>>>
>>>>>> > When backfilling data from the GW3000s SD Card, no rain is imported 
>>>>>> into the database.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It seems that you are not using the current version 0.2.0
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [email protected] schrieb am Samstag, 2. August 2025 um 16:49:18 
>>>>>> UTC+2:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> When backfilling data from the GW3000s SD Card, no rain is imported 
>>>>>>> into the database. There is no "rain" in the REC. I'm not so familiar 
>>>>>>> with 
>>>>>>> the process, but I guess there is something missing in my weewx.conf 
>>>>>>> that 
>>>>>>> is calculation rain from the RECs. By the way, is there a documentation 
>>>>>>> what the [Accumulator] is all about and when and how it is to be 
>>>>>>> used?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> REC:    2025-08-01 17:18:00 CEST (1754061480) 'altimeter': 
>>>>>>> '1013.6569194849516',
>>>>>>> 'appTemp': '23.50738354280469',
>>>>>>> 'barometer': '1011.2',
>>>>>>> 'cloudbase': '1372.254710571006',
>>>>>>> 'co2': '342.0',
>>>>>>> 'co2_Hum': '59.0',
>>>>>>> 'co2_Temp': '22.9',
>>>>>>> 'dateTime': '1754061480.0',
>>>>>>> 'dayRain': '0.6',
>>>>>>> 'dewpoint': '14.8',
>>>>>>> 'drain_piezo': '0.0',
>>>>>>> 'erain_piezo': '0.0',
>>>>>>> 'ET': '0.015721295892854044',
>>>>>>> 'eventRain': '15.1',
>>>>>>> 'extraHumid1': '51.0',
>>>>>>> 'extraHumid2': '70.0',
>>>>>>> 'extraHumid3': '64.0',
>>>>>>> 'extraHumid4': '64.0',
>>>>>>> 'extraHumid6': '49.0',
>>>>>>> 'extraHumid7': '66.0',
>>>>>>> 'extraHumid8': '66.0',
>>>>>>> 'extraTemp1': '20.2',
>>>>>>> 'extraTemp2': '21.5',
>>>>>>> 'extraTemp3': '21.7',
>>>>>>> 'extraTemp4': '21.9',
>>>>>>> 'extraTemp5': '21.1',
>>>>>>> 'extraTemp6': '19.7',
>>>>>>> 'extraTemp7': '21.9',
>>>>>>> 'extraTemp8': '21.6',
>>>>>>> 'hailRate': '0.0',
>>>>>>> 'heatindex': '22.314444444444444',
>>>>>>> 'hourRain': '0.0',
>>>>>>> 'humidex': '26.22374343350731',
>>>>>>> 'inDewpoint': '15.474126948319904',
>>>>>>> 'inHumidity': '63.0',
>>>>>>> 'inTemp': '22.9',
>>>>>>> 'interval': '5',
>>>>>>> 'lightning_dist': '20.0',
>>>>>>> 'lightning_distance': 'None',
>>>>>>> 'lightning_disturber_count': '1754038860.0',
>>>>>>> 'lightning_strike_count': '0.0',
>>>>>>> 'lightningcount': '0.0',
>>>>>>> 'luminosity': '31810.569',
>>>>>>> 'maxSolarRad': '481.7560939781643',
>>>>>>> 'monthRain': '0.6',
>>>>>>> 'mrain_piezo': '0.0',
>>>>>>> 'outHumidity': '62.0',
>>>>>>> 'outTemp': '22.4',
>>>>>>> 'p_rainrate': '0.0',
>>>>>>> 'p_rainyear': '0.5',
>>>>>>> 'pm2_5': '2.9',
>>>>>>> 'pm10_0': '3.2',
>>>>>>> 'pressure': '961.8',
>>>>>>> 'radiation': '251.07',
>>>>>>> 'rainRate': '0.0',
>>>>>>> 'rrain_piezo': '0.0',
>>>>>>> 'soilMoist1': '52.0',
>>>>>>> 'soilMoist2': '42.0',
>>>>>>> 't_rain': '15.1',
>>>>>>> 't_rainRate': '0.0',
>>>>>>> 't_rainyear': '235.2',
>>>>>>> 'usUnits': '17',
>>>>>>> 'UV': '2.0',
>>>>>>> 'vpd': '10.3',
>>>>>>> 'weekRain': '89.8',
>>>>>>> 'windchill': '22.399999999999995',
>>>>>>> 'windDir': '285.0',
>>>>>>> 'windGust': '1.0',
>>>>>>> 'windrun': '0.18',
>>>>>>> 'windSpeed': '0.6',
>>>>>>> 'wrain_piezo': '0.0',
>>>>>>> 'yearRain': '235.2',
>>>>>>> 'yrain_piezo': '0.5'
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Werner Krenn schrieb am Samstag, 26. Juli 2025 um 20:20:45 UTC+2:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> @Michael,
>>>>>>>> > Did you have BBQ for dinner?
>>>>>>>> No ;)
>>>>>>>> It is this problem, described on the Ecowitt homepage:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ★★Note:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 3.The sensor is sensitive to liquid droplets - rain/fog/sprinkling. 
>>>>>>>> When the Dew Point is close to the outdoor temperature(T - D < = 2C), 
>>>>>>>> the 
>>>>>>>> PM2.5 reading will be very high(which is not the real condition).
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> [email protected] schrieb am Samstag, 26. Juli 2025 um 20:03:07 
>>>>>>>> UTC+2:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Not too far away from my location. Did you have BBQ for dinner?
>>>>>>>>> [image: 2025-07-26 19_58_10-Das Wetter in Lackenhäuser .110 - 
>>>>>>>>> Brave.png]
>>>>>>>>> By the way, fuzzy-archer is currently at 4.4 :)
>>>>>>>>> Werner Krenn schrieb am Samstag, 26. Juli 2025 um 19:12:27 UTC+2:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> @Ian,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> 1) Rain 
>>>>>>>>>> I know this behavior (also with lightning) when the gw1000 driver 
>>>>>>>>>> also is started 
>>>>>>>>>> as a service or the original ecowitt_http driver (0.1.0a28) is 
>>>>>>>>>> used 
>>>>>>>>>> and data is read from Ecowitt.net (Cloud) or SDcard
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> 2)Ecowitt special database schema:
>>>>>>>>>> At the very beginning, I used wview_extended.
>>>>>>>>>> However, as more and more sensors were added, I expanded this 
>>>>>>>>>> schema into a new database schema, wview_ecowitt. 
>>>>>>>>>> This contains all possible Ecowitt sensors. However, 
>>>>>>>>>> self-selected signals are assigned to the existing fields 
>>>>>>>>>> signal1..signal8 in
>>>>>>>>>> [StdCalibrate]
>>>>>>>>>> [[Corrections]]
>>>>>>>>>> and extrapolated to 0..100 percent (*25).
>>>>>>>>>> And since 'hail' or 'pb' were present but unused, I mapped Piezo 
>>>>>>>>>> Rain or Heap to them.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> There is also a script file (add_ecowitt_allsignaldata_v5.sh) 
>>>>>>>>>> that can add all signals to the database.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> The same applies to all new RSSI values with the script file
>>>>>>>>>> add_ecowitt_allrssidata_v5.sh
>>>>>>>>>> The script files and schema file can be found on Github
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Skins with the data from ecowitt_http (in German!)
>>>>>>>>>> Skin Seasons Ecowitt:  
>>>>>>>>>> https://www.pc-wetterstation.de/wetter/weewx8
>>>>>>>>>> Skin Bootstrap:        
>>>>>>>>>> https://www.pc-wetterstation.de/wetter/weewx8/bootstrap/index.html
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> [email protected] schrieb am Samstag, 26. Juli 2025 um 
>>>>>>>>>> 09:13:28 UTC+2:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> My issue with p_rain is that the driver uses p_rainrate and my 
>>>>>>>>>>> database has the column p_rainRate (camelCase), which is the 
>>>>>>>>>>> WeeWX db style to name columns, thus I need to configure:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> [StdCalibrate]    
>>>>>>>>>>>     [[Corrections]]
>>>>>>>>>>>         p_rainRate = p_rainrate
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected] schrieb am Freitag, 25. Juli 2025 um 
>>>>>>>>>>> 22:57:11 UTC+2:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I still have the one or the other issue with p_rain, but that's 
>>>>>>>>>>>> very special to my ssetup running ecowitt_http as a driver and 
>>>>>>>>>>>> GW1000 as a 
>>>>>>>>>>>> service. And I so far couldn't confirm how the lightning detection 
>>>>>>>>>>>> works 
>>>>>>>>>>>> out with my settings. 
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Ian Millard schrieb am Freitag, 25. Juli 2025 um 16:36:35 UTC+2:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> @Michael, @Werner, @Vince,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have the WeeWX-Ecowitt_http working flawlessly in driver 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> mode now. So much so that I have confidently moved it across to 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> my live 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> server.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> There are just a couple of things to mention: -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1. Using the rain column to generates day, week, month etc 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> gives some rather bizarre results as @Michael discovered. The 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> safe way to 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> go is dayRain, weekRain etc which give the expected results.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2. It makes sense to me that if a dedicated Ecowitt database 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> schema is the way to go. If this is the case, the examples of 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> this that are 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> already out there need to come together to agree a standard. The 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> example I 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> quoted in an earlier post of using the hail column for piezo 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> rain, I 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> understand why this was done in the first instance, but surely if 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> we speak 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> about a dedicated schema, piezo rain should be fully supported in 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> its own 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> right?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I will be interested in our collective thoughts on this.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ian
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 21 Jul 2025, at 19:46, 'Werner Krenn' via weewx-user <
>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I only use these entries in the weewx.conf
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> [StdCalibrate]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>     [[Corrections]]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>         lightning_distance_save = lightning_dist if 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> lightning_dist is not None else None
>>>>>>>>>>>>>         lightning_distance = lightning_dist if 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> lightning_strike_count > 0 else None
>>>>>>>>>>>>>         lightning_noise_count = lightning_strike_count if 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> lightning_strike_count > 0 else None
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> [Accumulator]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>     [[lightning_distance]]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>         extractor = last
>>>>>>>>>>>>>     [[lightning_strike_count]]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>         extractor = sum
>>>>>>>>>>>>>     [[lightning_last_det_time]]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>         extractor = last
>>>>>>>>>>>>>     [[lightningcount]]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>         extractor = last
>>>>>>>>>>>>>     [[lightning_noise_count]]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>         extractor = sum
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ian Millard schrieb am Montag, 21. Juli 2025 um 20:01:38 UTC+2:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @Werner,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> How do you generate the last non-zero strike distance and 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> time? I have an X-Type to do that, but maybe you have another 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> way.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 17 Jul 2025, at 10:24, 'Werner Krenn' via weewx-user <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lightning_num
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is the number of lightning strikes on this day
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lightning_strike_count
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is the difference from the previous archive value.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That's the only way I know it, and that's how it is now again.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I use additionally
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [StdCalibrate] 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   [[Corrections]] 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>     lightning_noise_count = lightning_strike_count if 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lightning_strike_count > 0 else None
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [accumulator] 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   [[lightning_noise_count]] 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>     extractor = sum
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This allows me to display the last recorded number of 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lightning strikes per day 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> without them disappearing after one day.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected] schrieb am Mittwoch, 16. Juli 2025 um 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 22:29:28 UTC+2:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I've updated ecowitt_http.py (warnings gone), set debug = 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rain, removed the corrections entry for p_rain and here is the 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> log. No 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No more p_rain with the updated setting and the most recent 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version. (And yes, we had an considerable amount of rain here 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> today, ~ 40mm 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> so far and counting)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [image: 2025-07-16 22_26_09-Das Wetter in AT, Salzburg, 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hallein, Rif - Brave.png]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> By the way: 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>     "lightning_num": "23",
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>     "lightning_strike_count": "0",
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Today 23 strikes were registered. What's the change here, 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the old driver set the  lightning_strike_count.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Werner Krenn schrieb am Mittwoch, 16. Juli 2025 um 21:13:27 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> UTC+2:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Of course, it was meant to be debug at EcowittHttp:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [EcowittHttp]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   debug = rain
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> With the current version, under
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [[Corrections]]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>    p_rain = hail if hail is not None else None
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is no longer necessary!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected] schrieb am Mittwoch, 16. Juli 2025 um 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 20:18:00 UTC+2:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I've never heard of such an issue nor have I encountered 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> one, but this one so far with the GW3000
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have mapped p_rain for piezo_rain with
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [StdCalibrate]    
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>     [[Corrections]]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>         p_rain = hail if hail is not None else None
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> With debug = rain WeeWX didn't start, I've set logging to :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> debug = 3
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [Logging]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>     version = 1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>     disable_existing_loggers = False
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>     
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>     # Root logger
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>     [[root]]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>         level = INFO
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>         handlers = rotate,    #console
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>     
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>     # Additional loggers would go in the following 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> section. This is useful for tailoring logging
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>     # for individual modules.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>     [[loggers]]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>         [[[user.ecowitt_http]]]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>             level = DEBUG
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>     
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>     # Definitions of possible logging destinations
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>     [[handlers]]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>         
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>         # Log to a set of rotating files    
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>         [[[rotate]]]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>             level = INFO
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>             formatter = verbose
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>             class = logging.handlers.RotatingFileHandler
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>             filename = 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> /home/wusr/weewx-data/log/weewxd.log
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>             maxBytes = 10000000
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>             backupCount = 4
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Werner Krenn schrieb am Mittwoch, 16. Juli 2025 um 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 18:50:04 UTC+2:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please set
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> debug = rain
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What is mapped for piezo_rain?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> By the way, this behavior is why I changed the 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> calculation of rain and piezo_rain.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Connection issues:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Have you read about the issue with GW3000 1.0.9 on GitHub?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected] schrieb am Mittwoch, 16. Juli 2025 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> um 15:40:12 UTC+2:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> After a failed connection to the GW300, this happened 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with the piezo rain data:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Left: Old Ecowitt Gateway driver with GW2000, Right: 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ecowitt http driver with GW3000:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [image: 2025-07-16 15_34_54-Das Wetter in AT, Salzburg, 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hallein, Rif - Brave.png]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> From the log:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2025-07-16 13:28:17 weewxd[19407] INFO weewx.restx: 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> MQTT: Published record 2025-07-16 13:28:16 CEST (1752665296)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2025-07-16 13:28:27 weewxd[19407] INFO weewx.restx: 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> MQTT: Published record 2025-07-16 13:28:27 CEST (1752665307)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2025-07-16 13:28:37 weewxd[19407] INFO weewx.restx: 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> MQTT: Published record 2025-07-16 13:28:37 CEST (1752665317)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2025-07-16 13:28:47 weewxd[19407] INFO weewx.restx: 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> MQTT: Published record 2025-07-16 13:28:47 CEST (1752665327)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2025-07-16 13:29:07 weewxd[19407] ERROR 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> user.ecowitt_http: URL - Failed to get device data on 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> attempt 1 of 3
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2025-07-16 13:29:08 weewxd[19407] ERROR 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> user.ecowitt_http:    **** <urlopen error timed out>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2025-07-16 13:29:08 weewxd[19407] ERROR 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> user.ecowitt_http: Unable to obtain live sensor data
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2025-07-16 13:29:08 weewxd[19407] INFO weewx.engine: 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Main loop exiting. Shutting engine down.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2025-07-16 13:29:08 weewxd[19407] INFO weewx.engine: 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Shutting down StdReport thread
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2025-07-16 13:29:09 weewxd[19407] INFO 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> user.ecowitt_http: EcowittHttpCollector thread has been 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> terminated
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2025-07-16 13:29:09 weewxd[19407] CRITICAL weewxd: 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Caught WeeWxIOError: 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2025-07-16 13:29:09 weewxd[19407] CRITICAL weewxd:     
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ****  Waiting 60.0 seconds then retrying...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2025-07-16 13:30:09 weewxd[19407] INFO weewxd: 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> retrying...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2025-07-16 13:30:09 weewxd[19407] INFO weewx.engine: 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Loading station type EcowittHttp (user.ecowitt_http)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2025-07-16 13:30:09 weewxd[19407] INFO 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> user.ecowitt_http: EcowittHttpDriver: version is 0.1.0
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2025-07-16 13:30:09 weewxd[19407] INFO 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> user.ecowitt_http: unit_system: 17
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2025-07-16 13:30:09 weewxd[19407] INFO 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> user.ecowitt_http:      device IP address is 10.0.1.84
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2025-07-16 13:30:09 weewxd[19407] INFO 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> user.ecowitt_http:      poll interval is 10 seconds
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2025-07-16 13:30:09 weewxd[19407] INFO 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> user.ecowitt_http:      rain debug is not set
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2025-07-16 13:30:09 weewxd[19407] INFO 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> user.ecowitt_http:      wind debug is not set
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2025-07-16 13:30:09 weewxd[19407] INFO 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> user.ecowitt_http: lightning debug is not set
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2025-07-16 13:30:09 weewxd[19407] INFO 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> user.ecowitt_http:      loop debug is not set
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2025-07-16 13:30:09 weewxd[19407] INFO 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> user.ecowitt_http:   sensors debug is not set
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2025-07-16 13:30:09 weewxd[19407] INFO 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> user.ecowitt_http:   catchup debug is not set
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2025-07-16 13:30:09 weewxd[19407] INFO 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> user.ecowitt_http:    parser debug is not set
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2025-07-16 13:30:09 weewxd[19407] INFO 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> user.ecowitt_http: collector debug is not set
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2025-07-16 13:30:09 weewxd[19407] INFO 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> user.ecowitt_http:   archive debug is not set
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2025-07-16 13:30:09 weewxd[19407] INFO 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> user.ecowitt_http:    wn32_indoor: sensor ID decoding will 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> use indoor 'WN32'
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2025-07-16 13:30:09 weewxd[19407] INFO 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> user.ecowitt_http:   wn32_outdoor: sensor ID decoding will 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> use outdoor 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 'WN32P'
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2025-07-16 13:30:09 weewxd[19407] INFO 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> user.ecowitt_http:      device firmware update checks will 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> occur every 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 86400 seconds
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2025-07-16 13:30:09 weewxd[19407] INFO 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> user.ecowitt_http:      available device firmware updates 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> will be logged
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2025-07-16 13:30:09 weewxd[19407] INFO 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> user.ecowitt_http:      battery state will not be reported 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for sensors with 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> no signal data
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2025-07-16 13:30:09 weewxd[19407] INFO 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> user.ecowitt_http:      unknown fields will be ignored
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2025-07-16 13:30:09 weewxd[19407] INFO 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> user.ecowitt_http: catchup source: device
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2025-07-16 13:30:09 weewxd[19407] INFO 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> user.ecowitt_http: EcowittHttpCollector startup
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2025-07-16 13:30:09 weewxd[19407] INFO weewx.engine: 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> StdConvert target unit is 0x11
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2025-07-16 13:30:09 weewxd[19407] INFO weewx.wxservices: 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> StdWXCalculate will use data binding wx_binding
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2025-07-16 13:30:09 weewxd[19407] INFO weewx.engine: 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Archive will use data binding wx_binding
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2025-07-16 13:30:09 weewxd[19407] INFO weewx.engine: 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Record generation will be attempted in 'software'
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2025-07-16 13:30:09 weewxd[19407] INFO weewx.engine: 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Using archive interval of 300 seconds (software record 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> generation)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2025-07-16 13:30:09 weewxd[19407] INFO weewx.restx: 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> StationRegistry: Registration not requested.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2025-07-16 13:30:09 weewxd[19407] INFO weewx.restx: 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Wunderground: Posting not enabled.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2025-07-16 13:30:09 weewxd[19407] INFO weewx.restx: 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PWSweather: Posting not enabled.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2025-07-16 13:30:09 weewxd[19407] INFO weewx.restx: 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> CWOP: Posting not enabled.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2025-07-16 13:30:09 weewxd[19407] INFO weewx.restx: WOW: 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Posting not enabled.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2025-07-16 13:30:09 weewxd[19407] INFO weewx.restx: 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> AWEKAS: Posting not enabled.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2025-07-16 13:30:09 weewxd[19407] INFO user.mqtt: 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> service version is 0.24
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2025-07-16 13:30:09 weewxd[19407] INFO user.mqtt: 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> binding to loop
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2025-07-16 13:30:09 weewxd[19407] INFO user.mqtt: 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> data_binding is wx_binding
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2025-07-16 13:30:09 weewxd[19407] INFO user.mqtt: topic 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is weather_test_ws90
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2025-07-16 13:30:09 weewxd[19407] INFO user.mqtt: data 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> will be uploaded to mqtt://10.0.1.90:1883/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2025-07-16 13:30:09 weewxd[19407] INFO weewx.engine: 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 'pyephem' detected, extended almanac data is available
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2025-07-16 13:30:09 weewxd[19407] INFO weewxd: Starting 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> up weewx version 5.1.0
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2025-07-16 13:30:09 weewxd[19407] INFO weewx.engine: 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Using binding 'wx_binding' to database 'weewx-ws90.sdb'
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2025-07-16 13:30:09 weewxd[19407] INFO weewx.manager: 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Starting backfill of daily summaries
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2025-07-16 13:30:09 weewxd[19407] INFO weewx.manager: 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Daily summaries up to date
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2025-07-16 13:30:12 weewxd[19407] INFO 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> user.ecowitt_http: Archive: using 'rain.0x13.val' for rain 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> total
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2025-07-16 13:30:12 weewxd[19407] INFO 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> user.ecowitt_http: Archive: using 'piezoRain.0x13.val' for 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> piezo rain total
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2025-07-16 13:30:12 weewxd[19407] INFO 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> user.ecowitt_http: Archive: Skipping lightning count of 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.0: no last count
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2025-07-16 13:30:12 weewxd[19407] INFO weewx.manager: 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Added record 2025-07-16 13:28:00 CEST (1752665280) to 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> database 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 'weewx-ws90.sdb'
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2025-07-16 13:30:12 weewxd[19407] INFO weewx.manager: 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Added record 2025-07-16 13:28:00 CEST (1752665280) to daily 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> summary in 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 'weewx-ws90.sdb'
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2025-07-16 13:30:13 weewxd[19407] INFO weewx.engine: 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Starting main packet loop.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2025-07-16 13:30:13 weewxd[19407] INFO 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> user.ecowitt_http: Using 'rain.0x13.val' for rain total
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2025-07-16 13:30:13 weewxd[19407] INFO 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> user.ecowitt_http: Using 'piezoRain.0x13.val' for piezo 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rain total
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2025-07-16 13:30:13 weewxd[19407] INFO 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> user.ecowitt_http: Archive: skipping rain measurement of 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 600.4: no last rain
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2025-07-16 13:30:13 weewxd[19407] INFO 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> user.ecowitt_http: Archive: skipping piezo rain measurement 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of 691.3: no 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> last rain
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2025-07-16 13:30:13 weewxd[19407] INFO 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> user.ecowitt_http: Archive: Skipping lightning count of 1: 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> no last count
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2025-07-16 13:30:13 weewxd[19407] INFO user.mqtt: client 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> established for mqtt://10.0.1.90:1883/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2025-07-16 13:30:13 weewxd[19407] INFO weewx.restx: 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> MQTT: Published record 2025-07-16 13:30:09 CEST (1752665409)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2025-07-16 13:30:19 weewxd[19407] INFO weewx.restx: 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> MQTT: Published record 2025-07-16 13:30:19 CEST (1752665419)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2025-07-16 13:30:30 weewxd[19407] INFO weewx.restx: 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> MQTT: Published record 2025-07-16 13:30:29 CEST (1752665429)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected] schrieb am Montag, 14. Juli 2025 um 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 21:05:17 UTC+2:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The warnings shows up once, after the ecowitt_http.py 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> was altered when a new pycache object is created, only 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> showing up when 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> starting weewxd manually. It is console output not being 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> logged. 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> vince schrieb am Montag, 14. Juli 2025 um 20:03:48 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> UTC+2:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Monday, July 14, 2025 at 9:29:24 AM UTC-7 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> steepleian wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @Werner
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I find it very confusing that hail is used for p_rain.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> My database has columns for p_rain etc from mods I 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> made for GW2000 driver.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Agree.  I notice that weewx doesn't directly support 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> multiple wind nor rain sensors, so folks with a 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> combination if piezo and 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> old-style spinning/tipping sensors have issues mapping 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> database elements.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rather than requiring modifying the as-delivered weewx 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> schema, I'm wondering if an alternate approach might be 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to create an 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ecowitt-specific schema and a secondary db for whatever 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ecowitt supports. 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  Granted, skins would need to explicitly reference the 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ecowitt db binding, 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but it would make the database mapping issue a non-issue.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> FWIW - the purpleair extension I use as well as a 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> couple other extensions create these alternate databases 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on first use, so 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it's not a big deal.   You might consider taking the same 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> approach for 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ecowitt which has a growing list of uniquenesses as they 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> add more and more 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sensor types users can purchase.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That said, I do not know offhand if it is possible to 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have a driver's sensor_map use a secondary db rather than 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the default db. 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  That might be helpful to be able to do, or even to map 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> each sensor_map 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> item to the chosen db+element to read from.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Google Groups "weewx-user" group.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it, send an email to [email protected].
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To view this discussion visit 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/weewx-user/65ac62e1-ca01-48a1-bb84-72ba48e50b59n%40googlegroups.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/weewx-user/65ac62e1-ca01-48a1-bb84-72ba48e50b59n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> .
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Google Groups "weewx-user" group.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> it, send an email to [email protected].
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> To view this discussion visit 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/weewx-user/b2e50c63-665f-4b41-8daa-708c7f9b7ba3n%40googlegroups.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/weewx-user/b2e50c63-665f-4b41-8daa-708c7f9b7ba3n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> .
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- 
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>> Groups "weewx-user" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>>> an email to [email protected].
>>>
>>> To view this discussion visit 
>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/weewx-user/46ceccb1-49ce-40ee-ab5c-f4abf5561c7dn%40googlegroups.com
>>>  
>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/weewx-user/46ceccb1-49ce-40ee-ab5c-f4abf5561c7dn%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>> .
>>>
>>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "weewx-user" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to [email protected].
>>
>> To view this discussion visit 
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/weewx-user/e5034f32-ec88-4372-a13e-c6972f97ff7en%40googlegroups.com
>>  
>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/weewx-user/e5034f32-ec88-4372-a13e-c6972f97ff7en%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>> .
>>
>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"weewx-user" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/weewx-user/9353cacb-1618-4edc-a7b9-748c5fdfd3d7n%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to