@Michael, 
Have you tried adding p_rain:
p_rain: "group_rain"
to the file
"units.js" (Bootstrap skin) ?

michael.k...@gmx.at schrieb am Freitag, 12. September 2025 um 13:18:25 
UTC+2:

> My database contains values following METRICWX.
> LOOP data also contains p_rain in [mm], so in the MQTT object for the 
> LiveGauges there is no payload_key "p_rain_in", only "p_rain_mm", which 
> is 100% I'd expected things to be.
> I'll give it a try and use hail instead, and see what will happen, maybe 
> that gives us a clue what's happening. I mean: why should p_rain [mm] 
> behave in another way than rain [mm]? Maybe there is something missing in a 
> group/unit assignment for p_rain... it's not a common obs_type, neither in 
> wview, nor wview_extended.
>
> Werner Krenn schrieb am Freitag, 12. September 2025 um 11:32:27 UTC+2:
>
>> @Michael,
>> I assume you're using
>> target_unit = METRIC # Options are 'US', 'METRICWX', or 'METRIC'
>> or
>> target_unit = METRICWX
>>
>> I use target_unit = US
>> I don't know why p_rain is being then written to the database in inches 
>> for you; I don't have enough experience with WeeWx for that.
>>
>> But if you use
>> payload_key = p_rain_in
>> the display should be correct
>>
>> michael.k...@gmx.at schrieb am Freitag, 12. September 2025 um 05:25:57 
>> UTC+2:
>>
>>> May it's that I use p_rain and not hail:
>>>
>>>           [[[[rain]]]]
>>>                 [[[[[rain]]]]]
>>>                     payload_key = rain_mm
>>>                 [[[[[p_rain]]]]]
>>>                     plotType = bar
>>>                     aggregateType = sum
>>>                     aggregateInterval = 1800
>>>                     payload_key = p_rain_mm
>>>                     showMaxMarkPoint = false
>>>                     showMinMarkPoint = false
>>>                     showAvgMarkLine = false
>>>                     lineColor = "#428bca77"
>>>                     decimals = 1
>>>
>>> The interesting thing is, when receiving data from LOOP using MQTT, the 
>>> value is correct, it's only the databa value that isn't.
>>> John Smith schrieb am Freitag, 12. September 2025 um 03:57:19 UTC+2:
>>>
>>>> On Fri, 12 Sept 2025 at 03:41, p q <peterq...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I am pretty sure the US uses the international inch for far longer. 
>>>>> Since before I started working with canadian companies in the 1990s. 
>>>>> There 
>>>>> is official looking documentation that shows the international yard (and 
>>>>> thus the inch) defined in 1959 
>>>>> https://usma.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/sp447-app5.pdf?x40840
>>>>> There are still various survey foot definitions with slightly 
>>>>> different values in the US, and of course the nautical mile and related 
>>>>> measures. 
>>>>> https://oceanservice.noaa.gov/geodesy/international-foot.html
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> If you disagree update the Wikipedia page with references... *grin* 
>>>>
>>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"weewx-user" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to weewx-user+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/weewx-user/1c945c31-c162-402c-bd60-79cc2a30e530n%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to