On Wed, 19 Nov 2025 at 21:40, 'Cameron D' via weewx-user < [email protected]> wrote:
> The WUnderground stuff was purely via weewx, and I have never bothered > with the rapidfire side. My console is a No it was someone else and their console must have been IP based... My point was their console, and USB ones especially for that matter, don't usually cope with multiple connections, if at all to be able to have a setup with 2 instances of weeWX with 2 different archive reporting periods... > The kiss principle says that by the trivial process of increasing the > number of rows by a factor of 5, while reducing number of columns by a > factor of 3 and halving the number of bytes per column means that I have > achieved a > It probably isn't linear like that, so the losses would probably still outweigh any gains... > "good enough" situation without any significant effort. Allowing for a > larger index means my system is probably close to the default size anyway. > That was also my point, I had 80+ columns just storing NULLs, compared to just over 30 columns with data, now my DB is just over 1/10th it's former self with no data loss... and if the arm processor coped with a 1.1GB table it should do even better now that the table is just over 170MB... > I did try Belchertown, perhaps 8 years ago, without much success, so > perhaps the short interval was what upset it. > I haven't tried it, nor MQTT for that matter, but I am still marginally aware of the underlying principals... -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "weewx-user" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/weewx-user/CAGTinV67-5TttocRseyyivVSS5n7GaXxpU26tireWOp9DgRnMg%40mail.gmail.com.
