Yeah..right and at what cost?
What are they going to leave out?

On Tuesday, 10 February 2026 at 08:05:34 UTC+11 John Smith wrote:

> BoM reveals plan to fix website within six months
>
>
> https://www.itnews.com.au/news/bom-reveals-plan-to-fix-website-within-six-months-623493
>
> On Sat, 7 Feb 2026 at 14:36, John Smith <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Forgot to bring up the UV forecasts BoM makes and they are usually too 
>> high and their UVI 3+ times usually start too early in the day and end too 
>> late in the evening. They seem to only use satellite readings rather than 
>> ground sensors and they have a disclaimer about cloud cover etc
>>
>> I've come to realise that UVI isn't solely based on conditions on earth 
>> either, it's highly dependent on how active the sun is.
>>
>> This summer the maximum UVI recorded was "only" 11.7 and we've had lots 
>> of cloudless skies this year yet last summer it hit 13.1 in January but the 
>> all time record was 15.8 during 2017 when the sun was supposed to be 
>> heading toward the minimum activity period of it's cycle but there were 
>> several maximum severity flares released that thankfully didn't head in our 
>> direction.
>>
>> Both the highest maximum temperature I've recorded and the maximum 
>> recorded UVI happened on different days in February that year.
>>
>> I've sent emails to the BoM about this and had no reply so they don't 
>> seem that interested in fixing their forecasts which is disappointing and 
>> yet again another misleading thing on their website.
>>
>> I guess it'll only be downhill for their public facing website from here.
>>
>>
>> On Wed, 4 Feb 2026 at 15:34, John Smith <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> UK WOW is headed in the same direction that despite raving on about how 
>>> useful the data is from hobbyists they now only care about getting it from 
>>> station manufacturers which who knows how bad that may be when little 
>>> johnny puts up something haphazardly on the balcony of his inner city 
>>> apartment.
>>>
>>> On Wed, 4 Feb 2026, 13:46 Graham Eddy, <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> i think BOM is providing dumbed-down interface for unsophisticated 
>>>> consumers.
>>>> they have (expensive) products for commercial consumers.
>>>> this begs the question: where are the data feeds for the middle ground 
>>>> e.g. citizen scientists like us? i suspect BOM’s disregard of amateur 
>>>> weather statios (unlike UK WOW) relates to their commercial focus 
>>>> (guaranteed, high quality data streams)
>>>> *⊣GE⊢*
>>>>
>>>> On 4 Feb 2026, at 1:33 pm, Greg from Oz <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Seems like the BOM is being run by people who nothing about the weather 
>>>> and the consequences of their decisions.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Wednesday, 4 February 2026 at 09:40:50 UTC+11 John Smith wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> More poor decisions that BoM made when they had the new website coded, 
>>>>> apart from rain being reported on the easy to access location pages as 
>>>>> midnight to midnight and only hourly now even though there is at least 
>>>>> half 
>>>>> hourly records making rain rates misleading as well.
>>>>>
>>>>> For example in early January on the old site the rain rate over the 
>>>>> 30min period was at least 40.4mm/hr but because of the decision to report 
>>>>> hourly on the new site the rain rate using that was only 22.2mm/hr 
>>>>> because 
>>>>> it all fell within 30 minutes. This can really matter during extreme rain 
>>>>> fall events to predict if there will be flooding before river gauges 
>>>>> start 
>>>>> showing rising water levels.
>>>>>
>>>>> Now I've been informed that minimum "overnight" temperatures are taken 
>>>>> from 6 pm to 9 am so during summer the world seems like it's on fire 
>>>>> because at 7pm in the evening it can be still over 35C in many locations 
>>>>> such as yesterday which is totally misleading and confusing IMHO.
>>>>>
>>>>> Maximum temperatures are 6am to 9pm which may seem sane but again can 
>>>>> be misleading if it was warmer at midnight and a cool change has gone 
>>>>> through.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, 9 Jan 2026 at 20:41, John Smith <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> It's just the public/main website as best I can tell, historical data 
>>>>>> files still seem to be 9-9...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, 9 Jan 2026 at 14:30, 'Cameron D' via weewx-user <
>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I have been downloading the station observation files  since about 
>>>>>>> 2011, and there have been no changes since 2023.
>>>>>>> Rain_trace  is still cumulative, starting at 9:00
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Wednesday, 7 January 2026 at 4:28:10 pm UTC+10 John Smith wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I've come across some more "interesting" design choices by the BoM 
>>>>>>>> for their new website.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Firstly rain observations are now grouped by hour, rather than 
>>>>>>>> showing individual readings, which in most cases was every half hour.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The new website no longer shows a running total for rain either, so 
>>>>>>>> you need to manually add up the hourly totals or check the high/low 
>>>>>>>> section 
>>>>>>>> for daily total (midnight to midnight of course)l.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I was told in no uncertain terms that this is intentional and they 
>>>>>>>> won't be reverting to how the old site worked.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Luckily for now the old site still functions the same as it did 
>>>>>>>> prior to the new site going live.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Weatherzone seems to still operate in the same manner as well, so 
>>>>>>>> some choices for now.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>>>>> Groups "weewx-user" group.
>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, 
>>>>>>> send an email to [email protected].
>>>>>>> To view this discussion visit 
>>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/weewx-user/e6122b29-7f99-4859-b798-2833609e6c2bn%40googlegroups.com
>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/weewx-user/e6122b29-7f99-4859-b798-2833609e6c2bn%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>>>>> .
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>> -- 
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>> Groups "weewx-user" group.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>>>> an email to [email protected].
>>>> To view this discussion visit 
>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/weewx-user/558e394e-4b41-4342-aad0-da76e4c84f6fn%40googlegroups.com
>>>>  
>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/weewx-user/558e394e-4b41-4342-aad0-da76e4c84f6fn%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>> .
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -- 
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>> Groups "weewx-user" group.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>>>> an email to [email protected].
>>>> To view this discussion visit 
>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/weewx-user/E8667DE2-DEB6-4AD5-A6B0-28197662ECB3%40geddy.au
>>>>  
>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/weewx-user/E8667DE2-DEB6-4AD5-A6B0-28197662ECB3%40geddy.au?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>> .
>>>>
>>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"weewx-user" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/weewx-user/52cfbf3b-c8b7-49c5-9dbb-a799cc0bbf99n%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to