>
> it is quite possible that the b16 is messing things up

This why I favour building packages as X.Y-1.99 to avoid such problems with
other people's software :D

On Mon, 22 Jun 2026 at 14:22, matthew wall <[email protected]> wrote:

>
>
> > On Jun 21, 2026, at 14:46, 'Peter Fletcher' via weewx-user <
> [email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > However, when weewx was restarted by apt, I noticed that it was using a
> differently named .conf file (weewx.conf-5.0.0b16-5.4.0).
>
> that would require a change to the systemd unit file, telling weewxd to
> use weewx.conf-5.0.0b16-5.4.0 instead of weewx.conf.  i am pretty sure that
> your system is still using weewx.conf.  if not, please provide more
> information.
>
>
> > weewx started up normally, and the 'new' .conf file turns out to be a
> copy of my original, with a change in the version parameter from 5.0.0b16
> to 5.4.0 and a couple of minor changes in some commented text.
>
> if you choose to use the maintainer's version, or if you mess with the
> 'version' field, then the apt logic will copy the maintainer's version into
> weewx.conf.
>
>
> > In one sense, it can be argued that the upgrade did keep my old version
> of weewx.conf - just under a new name! However, the potential problem with
> this behavior, if I had not noticed the change, is that I might make a
> modification to the original weewx.conf in the future and get very confused
> by its not working!
>
> if you modify weewx.conf, then there should be no confusion.  weewx.conf
> is what your system uses unless you change the systemd configuration.
>
>
> > I think that this represents a change in behavior, but it may not be a
> recent one, since weewx wasn't apt installed on my bookworm system, and I
> think that this is the first time it has been upgraded by apt on my Trixie
> system. Why is "keep my existing weewx.conf" no longer being taken
> literally?
>
> it is quite possible that the b16 is messing things up, resulting in you
> getting a maintainer's version (which could look just like your original
> conf, but with mangled/reformatted comments).
>
> we have had issues with the operating systems' comparisons of versions.  i
> don't remember if this is true for dpkg, but there were cases where
> 5.1.0b10 was treated as newer than 5.1.0, for example.
>
> apologies for the previous, lengthy response that did not address your
> questions directly.
>
> m
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "weewx-user" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To view this discussion visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/weewx-user/F9C6E6AA-B1EF-4E8B-B76C-0A6CE82334BC%40gmail.com
> .
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"weewx-user" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/weewx-user/CAGTinV5dU%3D4UaUAW7Jo2vO%3DAz_emro5j0iRSfAzSXjiYfz_%2Bdg%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to