Re: [wc] oh my god

Thu, 23 Mar 2006 10:54:17 -0800

It is repulsive if the situation is what it first appears, but I wonder if it's possible this couple was involved in a D/S lifestyle relationship that has now soured.  Doesn't sound like it, but couples in the lifestyle often do have contracts with very similar specifications and reward/punishment systems.  Most of these relationships are consensual and healthy.  In any event, something went wrong somewhere, and there is NEVER any lifestyle justification for child pornography (defining child porn however...thornier issue than you might think.)

Also, did anyone see this story: http://tinyurl.com/gy667.  Not sure how I feel about this one.  On the one hand, I believe almost absolutely in the right to privacy in the home and gender equality, but on the other hand, domestic abuse cases are difficult enough to prosecute without adding another layer of red tape and delay.


hermespal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
That marriage contract thing in the update is, as they state on the
site, repulsive. I think I need to go take a shower after reading it.








YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



Reply via email to