Thankfully, it can't be sorted by number of messages that have
actually been funny.

--- In [email protected], "Ellen"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I think a more useful number would be rate since joining, since you
> can't compare someone who has been in since Dec. 1 with someone who
> has been in since Mar. 1 with absolute numbers--something like
average
> posts per week since joining I think would be a better basis of
> comparison.
>
>
> --- In [email protected], "Hannah Robinson"
> <hjrobinson@> wrote:
> >
> > On 5/2/06, James <ttlsccr@> wrote:
> > >
> > > I've never been so ashamed in all my life.
> > >
> >
> >
> > Because you're second in line, or because Ellen's kicking your ass
> so bad?
> >
>






YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS




Reply via email to